Newest at the top
2024-12-24 02:03:23 +0100 | <loonycyborg> | I was thinking more of " I don't care about order so I can do hashmap" but not sure how it applies to compile-time |
2024-12-24 02:03:19 +0100 | merijn | (~merijn@128-137-045-062.dynamic.caiway.nl) (Ping timeout: 245 seconds) |
2024-12-24 02:00:50 +0100 | <EvanR> | the first ones easier |
2024-12-24 02:00:42 +0100 | Feuermagier_ | Feuermagier |
2024-12-24 02:00:42 +0100 | Guest7514 | (~Feuermagi@user/feuermagier) (Killed (zirconium.libera.chat (Nickname regained by services))) |
2024-12-24 02:00:42 +0100 | Feuermagier_ | (~Feuermagi@user/feuermagier) Feuermagier |
2024-12-24 02:00:42 +0100 | Feuermagier | Guest7514 |
2024-12-24 02:00:31 +0100 | <EvanR> | there's "I don't care about order" and "we need the types to enforce nobody not even god can care about order" |
2024-12-24 01:59:24 +0100 | <EvanR> | yes the string itself is a type of kind Symbol |
2024-12-24 01:57:12 +0100 | Feuermagier_ | Feuermagier |
2024-12-24 01:57:12 +0100 | Guest5199 | (~Feuermagi@user/feuermagier) (Killed (lead.libera.chat (Nickname regained by services))) |
2024-12-24 01:57:12 +0100 | Feuermagier | Guest5199 |
2024-12-24 01:57:12 +0100 | Feuermagier_ | (~Feuermagi@user/feuermagier) Feuermagier |
2024-12-24 01:57:02 +0100 | <monochrom> | GHC has type-level string literals. |
2024-12-24 01:57:02 +0100 | Guest78 | (~Guest78@2a02:8084:1:6500::db) (Quit: Client closed) |
2024-12-24 01:56:50 +0100 | merijn | (~merijn@128-137-045-062.dynamic.caiway.nl) merijn |
2024-12-24 01:50:40 +0100 | rvalue | (~rvalue@user/rvalue) rvalue |
2024-12-24 01:47:33 +0100 | rvalue | (~rvalue@user/rvalue) (Ping timeout: 272 seconds) |
2024-12-24 01:45:46 +0100 | merijn | (~merijn@128-137-045-062.dynamic.caiway.nl) (Ping timeout: 252 seconds) |
2024-12-24 01:41:41 +0100 | sprotte24 | (~sprotte24@p200300d16f2af800514f7155ca1159f4.dip0.t-ipconnect.de) (Read error: Connection reset by peer) |
2024-12-24 01:41:25 +0100 | merijn | (~merijn@128-137-045-062.dynamic.caiway.nl) merijn |
2024-12-24 01:39:00 +0100 | jonrh | (sid5185@id-5185.ilkley.irccloud.com) jonrh |
2024-12-24 01:38:54 +0100 | PotatoGim | (sid99505@id-99505.lymington.irccloud.com) PotatoGim |
2024-12-24 01:38:46 +0100 | rubin55 | (sid666177@id-666177.lymington.irccloud.com) rubin55 |
2024-12-24 01:38:43 +0100 | snek | (sid280155@id-280155.lymington.irccloud.com) snek |
2024-12-24 01:38:41 +0100 | cbarrett | (uid192934@id-192934.helmsley.irccloud.com) cbarrett |
2024-12-24 01:37:20 +0100 | <loonycyborg> | seems use case I have in mind mostly asks for "extensible records", but I don't care about order at all |
2024-12-24 01:35:49 +0100 | jonrh | (sid5185@id-5185.ilkley.irccloud.com) (Ping timeout: 245 seconds) |
2024-12-24 01:35:49 +0100 | rubin55 | (sid666177@id-666177.lymington.irccloud.com) (Ping timeout: 245 seconds) |
2024-12-24 01:35:49 +0100 | cbarrett | (uid192934@id-192934.helmsley.irccloud.com) (Ping timeout: 245 seconds) |
2024-12-24 01:35:49 +0100 | snek | (sid280155@id-280155.lymington.irccloud.com) (Ping timeout: 245 seconds) |
2024-12-24 01:35:04 +0100 | <loonycyborg> | what would be the best way currently to make a compile-time mapping from strings to types? |
2024-12-24 01:34:59 +0100 | PotatoGim | (sid99505@id-99505.lymington.irccloud.com) (Ping timeout: 245 seconds) |
2024-12-24 01:33:24 +0100 | statusbot8 | (~statusbot@ec2-34-198-122-184.compute-1.amazonaws.com) statusbot |
2024-12-24 01:33:18 +0100 | statusbot | (~statusbot@ec2-34-198-122-184.compute-1.amazonaws.com) (Read error: Connection reset by peer) |
2024-12-24 01:31:44 +0100 | simplystuart | (~simplystu@c-75-75-152-164.hsd1.pa.comcast.net) (Remote host closed the connection) |
2024-12-24 01:30:58 +0100 | merijn | (~merijn@128-137-045-062.dynamic.caiway.nl) (Ping timeout: 265 seconds) |
2024-12-24 01:26:02 +0100 | merijn | (~merijn@128-137-045-062.dynamic.caiway.nl) merijn |
2024-12-24 01:22:31 +0100 | rvalue | (~rvalue@user/rvalue) rvalue |
2024-12-24 01:14:53 +0100 | merijn | (~merijn@128-137-045-062.dynamic.caiway.nl) (Ping timeout: 244 seconds) |
2024-12-24 01:14:44 +0100 | Sgeo | (~Sgeo@user/sgeo) Sgeo |
2024-12-24 01:12:36 +0100 | peterbecich | (~Thunderbi@syn-047-229-123-186.res.spectrum.com) (Ping timeout: 265 seconds) |
2024-12-24 01:10:40 +0100 | merijn | (~merijn@128-137-045-062.dynamic.caiway.nl) merijn |
2024-12-24 01:10:29 +0100 | loonycyborg | (loonycybor@wesnoth/developer/loonycyborg) loonycyborg |
2024-12-24 01:10:17 +0100 | loonycyborg_ | (loonycybor@chantal.wesnoth.org) (Quit: ZNC - http://znc.sourceforge.net) |
2024-12-24 01:08:02 +0100 | <haskellbridge> | <thirdofmay18081814goya> of the context*, don't know why I said of the secret |
2024-12-24 01:07:45 +0100 | <haskellbridge> | <thirdofmay18081814goya> * anyways" |
2024-12-24 01:07:36 +0100 | <haskellbridge> | <thirdofmay18081814goya> i.e., that implication provides the semantics for: "it doesn't matter the order in which you evaluate/propagate through this part of the secret, it will yield "A" anyways |
2024-12-24 01:05:59 +0100 | <haskellbridge> | <thirdofmay18081814goya> it suddenly made sense because as I was thinking about FRP, I realized, under the interpretation you give "[] Gamma |- A -> [] Gamma |- [] A" encodes that "[] Gamma" is sequence-independent in allowing the circuit to propagate to the next term, "A" |
2024-12-24 01:04:21 +0100 | weary-traveler | (~user@user/user363627) user363627 |