2026/02/26

Newest at the top

2026-02-26 14:46:09 +0100skinkitten(~skinkitte@user/skinkitten) skinkitten
2026-02-26 14:42:31 +0100Googulator12Googulator
2026-02-26 14:38:53 +0100tusko(~uwu@user/tusko) tusko
2026-02-26 14:38:39 +0100tusko(~uwu@user/tusko) (Remote host closed the connection)
2026-02-26 14:34:21 +0100califax_califax
2026-02-26 14:34:20 +0100califax(~califax@user/califx) (Ping timeout: 252 seconds)
2026-02-26 14:34:20 +0100tales(~tales@149.167.1.176) (Ping timeout: 245 seconds)
2026-02-26 14:34:20 +0100realBeginner(~realBegin@164.215.171.125) (Client Quit)
2026-02-26 14:33:34 +0100realBeginner(~realBegin@164.215.171.125)
2026-02-26 14:33:27 +0100tromp(~textual@2001:1c00:3487:1b00:7955:9591:6018:7ef9)
2026-02-26 14:30:27 +0100califax_(~califax@user/califx) califx
2026-02-26 14:23:47 +0100haritz(~hrtz@user/haritz) haritz
2026-02-26 14:23:47 +0100haritz(~hrtz@2a01:4b00:bc2e:7000:d5af:a266:ca31:5ef8) (Changing host)
2026-02-26 14:23:47 +0100haritz(~hrtz@2a01:4b00:bc2e:7000:d5af:a266:ca31:5ef8)
2026-02-26 14:23:45 +0100 <Clint> it's not always a good reason ;P
2026-02-26 14:22:36 +0100tales(~tales@149.167.1.176)
2026-02-26 14:22:31 +0100realBeginner(~realBegin@164.215.171.125) (Quit: Ping timeout (120 seconds))
2026-02-26 14:21:40 +0100 <geekosaur> for something like C or C++ there's enough overlap not to be a problem, but there's a reason why other languages always tell you to use their installers and/or sandboxes
2026-02-26 14:20:57 +0100 <geekosaur> just remember that, on any distro, their language packages support their needs, not yours
2026-02-26 14:20:33 +0100 <geekosaur> it's fine if you ignore their packages and use ghcup
2026-02-26 14:19:56 +0100 <realBeginner> My distro is Arch‑based; is that okay, or should I choose another distro that supports Haskell?
2026-02-26 14:18:00 +0100 <ski> a textbook might also be nice
2026-02-26 14:17:44 +0100 <lambdabot> <https://github.com/byorgey/haskell-course>,<https://www.seas.upenn.edu/~cis194/spring13/lectures.html>
2026-02-26 14:17:43 +0100 <ski> @where CIS194
2026-02-26 14:17:06 +0100 <oskarw> Try out haskell, if you have any problems just ask here. Here is haskell study guide I can recommend https://github.com/soupi/haskell-study-plan
2026-02-26 14:16:36 +0100 <realBeginner> The idea that there are infinitely many numbers between 0 and 1 is really amazing to me, I just enjoy thinking about these subjects.
2026-02-26 14:16:03 +0100 <oskarw> Actual geometry enjoyer
2026-02-26 14:13:30 +0100arandombit(~arandombi@user/arandombit) (Remote host closed the connection)
2026-02-26 14:13:23 +0100 <realBeginner> I enjoy geometry
2026-02-26 14:13:14 +0100misterfish(~misterfis@31-161-39-137.biz.kpn.net) misterfish
2026-02-26 14:10:25 +0100 <oskarw> Also, do you like math?
2026-02-26 14:10:10 +0100misterfish(~misterfis@31-161-39-137.biz.kpn.net) (Ping timeout: 245 seconds)
2026-02-26 14:09:45 +0100 <oskarw> realBeginner: If you want to broaden your way of thinking, than haskell certainly can do that
2026-02-26 14:09:01 +0100 <realBeginner> I love learning how to think and enjoy making complex things easier to do.
2026-02-26 14:08:50 +0100 <oskarw> newmind: But together with parser it really throw me off. When I done some implementations for list for applicative and doing other exercises from typeclassopedia I didn't had that much of a problem
2026-02-26 14:08:48 +0100tales(~tales@149.167.1.176) (Ping timeout: 246 seconds)
2026-02-26 14:07:04 +0100 <oskarw> ski: I know you like sexps ;)
2026-02-26 14:06:23 +0100 <oskarw> merijn: From which source did your girlfriend learned Haskell?
2026-02-26 14:05:13 +0100 <newmind> i think it's the first time you encounter something that really has no sensible analog in procedural/oop programming
2026-02-26 14:05:01 +0100 <oskarw> realBeginner: Do you have like dream program you want to make? Maybe we can help you more in recommending your programming lanugage based on this answer
2026-02-26 14:04:43 +0100tromp(~textual@2001:1c00:3487:1b00:7955:9591:6018:7ef9) (Quit: My iMac has gone to sleep. ZZZzzz…)
2026-02-26 14:04:34 +0100tales(~tales@149.167.1.176)
2026-02-26 14:03:34 +0100 <oskarw> newmind: I remember spend _a lot of time_ on applicative exercise from cis194
2026-02-26 14:03:30 +0100 <ski> realBeginner : Lisps (like e.g. Scheme), and Prolog, have quite simple concrete syntax. Haskell is a bit more complicated, but, for the most part, i'd say, fairly regular, few corner cases/exceptions
2026-02-26 14:03:04 +0100divya(divya@140.238.251.170) divya
2026-02-26 14:02:03 +0100 <Leary> realBeginner: Haskell is certainly the language most concerned with regularity.
2026-02-26 14:01:58 +0100 <darkling> Haskell is definitely mathematical catnip.
2026-02-26 14:00:59 +0100ChaiTRex(~ChaiTRex@user/chaitrex) ChaiTRex
2026-02-26 14:00:27 +0100ChaiTRex(~ChaiTRex@user/chaitrex) (Remote host closed the connection)
2026-02-26 14:00:23 +0100 <oskarw> Maybe because I had mathematical education I didn't have problems with haskell...