Newest at the top
| 2024-12-21 16:34:52 +0100 | wootehfoot | (~wootehfoo@user/wootehfoot) (Ping timeout: 252 seconds) |
| 2024-12-21 16:33:01 +0100 | merijn | (~merijn@128-137-045-062.dynamic.caiway.nl) (Ping timeout: 252 seconds) |
| 2024-12-21 16:28:42 +0100 | merijn | (~merijn@128-137-045-062.dynamic.caiway.nl) merijn |
| 2024-12-21 16:22:01 +0100 | ephilalethes | (~noumenon@202.186.203.84) (Read error: Connection reset by peer) |
| 2024-12-21 16:20:23 +0100 | CrunchyFlakes | (~CrunchyFl@ip1f13e94e.dynamic.kabel-deutschland.de) |
| 2024-12-21 16:18:32 +0100 | CrunchyFlakes | (~CrunchyFl@31.19.233.78) (Read error: Connection reset by peer) |
| 2024-12-21 16:17:41 +0100 | merijn | (~merijn@128-137-045-062.dynamic.caiway.nl) (Ping timeout: 248 seconds) |
| 2024-12-21 16:15:42 +0100 | tremon | (~tremon@83.80.159.219) (Quit: getting boxed in) |
| 2024-12-21 16:15:04 +0100 | <enikar> | APL is too odd |
| 2024-12-21 16:14:01 +0100 | youthlic | (~Thunderbi@user/youthlic) (Client Quit) |
| 2024-12-21 16:13:59 +0100 | youthlic | (~Thunderbi@user/youthlic) youthlic |
| 2024-12-21 16:13:50 +0100 | <probie> | sorry, `×.◌:4 3` |
| 2024-12-21 16:13:39 +0100 | ski | nods |
| 2024-12-21 16:13:22 +0100 | merijn | (~merijn@128-137-045-062.dynamic.caiway.nl) merijn |
| 2024-12-21 16:13:21 +0100 | <probie> | e.g. `3 4 swap drop dup *` would be `×.◌:3 4` |
| 2024-12-21 16:10:49 +0100 | <probie> | ski: yes, but it since it's also inspired by APL and therefore everything important needs to be a single character, they're most commonly spelled `:`, `◌` and `.` respectively |
| 2024-12-21 16:07:37 +0100 | youthlic | (~Thunderbi@user/youthlic) (Quit: youthlic) |
| 2024-12-21 16:07:14 +0100 | <enikar> | ski: thanks, I didn't know that, but I wrote a simple calculator that used threaded code. |
| 2024-12-21 16:06:22 +0100 | <ski> | probie : does it have `swap',`drop' and `dup' ? |
| 2024-12-21 16:05:55 +0100 | <ski> | that's interesting |
| 2024-12-21 16:05:48 +0100 | wootehfoot | (~wootehfoo@user/wootehfoot) wootehfoot |
| 2024-12-21 16:05:33 +0100 | <probie> | I'm not sure if I'd call it a truly concatenative language, but Uiuia is stack based language in which Haskell's `f . g` is written as `f g`. However `f\ng` (where \n is a literal newline) is the same as `g f`. |
| 2024-12-21 16:04:33 +0100 | <enikar> | never mind :) |
| 2024-12-21 16:04:27 +0100 | <ski> | enikar : <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Threaded_code> is also interesting |
| 2024-12-21 16:03:42 +0100 | <ski> | (er, sorry, that was probie who said that) |
| 2024-12-21 16:02:30 +0100 | merijn | (~merijn@128-137-045-062.dynamic.caiway.nl) (Ping timeout: 260 seconds) |
| 2024-12-21 16:02:20 +0100 | <enikar> | yes it is |
| 2024-12-21 16:01:59 +0100 | <ski> | enikar : .. which may be unexpected/surprising (re your comment about `f . g' above) |
| 2024-12-21 16:01:30 +0100 | <ski> | probie : *nod* (re Smalltalk) |
| 2024-12-21 16:01:28 +0100 | <enikar> | oh! I see! |
| 2024-12-21 15:59:51 +0100 | <ski> | (btw, note how `foo . bar' does the word `foo' first, and then the word `bar', not the other way around) |
| 2024-12-21 15:58:54 +0100 | <enikar> | yes :) |
| 2024-12-21 15:58:44 +0100 | <ski> | enikar : like that ^ |
| 2024-12-21 15:58:37 +0100 | <lambdabot> | 9 |
| 2024-12-21 15:58:36 +0100 | <ski> | > run (lit 3 . dup . mult) -- `3 * 3' |
| 2024-12-21 15:58:19 +0100 | <lambdabot> | -1 |
| 2024-12-21 15:58:17 +0100 | <ski> | > run (lit 3 . lit 2 . swap_ . sub) -- `2 - 3' |
| 2024-12-21 15:58:08 +0100 | <lambdabot> | 1 |
| 2024-12-21 15:58:06 +0100 | <ski> | > run (lit 3 . lit 2 . sub) -- `3 - 2' |
| 2024-12-21 15:58:03 +0100 | merijn | (~merijn@128-137-045-062.dynamic.caiway.nl) merijn |
| 2024-12-21 15:57:57 +0100 | <lambdabot> | 7 |
| 2024-12-21 15:57:39 +0100 | <ski> | > run (lit 1 . lit 3 . lit 2 . mult . add) -- `1 + 3 * 2' |
| 2024-12-21 15:57:33 +0100 | wootehfoot | (~wootehfoo@user/wootehfoot) (Ping timeout: 246 seconds) |
| 2024-12-21 15:57:25 +0100 | <lambdabot> | 7 |
| 2024-12-21 15:57:24 +0100 | <ski> | > run (lit 3 . lit 2 . mult . lit 1 . add) -- `3 * 2 + 1' |
| 2024-12-21 15:56:59 +0100 | <enikar> | when I discovered forth it was a great moment :) |
| 2024-12-21 15:54:52 +0100 | <probie> | In a concatenative programming language, If I have a function `f` and a function `g`, their composition (written in Haskell as `f . g`) is just `g f` |
| 2024-12-21 15:53:30 +0100 | <enikar> | I found that: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Concatenative_programming_language |
| 2024-12-21 15:52:40 +0100 | <probie> | languages like Forth and Factor |
| 2024-12-21 15:52:21 +0100 | <enikar> | ski: concatenative languages? |