Newest at the top
2024-11-14 21:42:12 +0100 | <guy_> | sm: dead link |
2024-11-14 21:41:59 +0100 | <sm> | probably not needed |
2024-11-14 21:41:38 +0100 | <sm> | shapr thanks! https://joyful.com is the other |
2024-11-14 21:41:35 +0100 | <guy_> | yeah, i wonder what he's up too! |
2024-11-14 21:41:21 +0100 | <sm> | nice link guy_. I'd love to see Neil's latest build system, whatever it is |
2024-11-14 21:41:08 +0100 | <guy_> | the moustache specification markup seems interesting |
2024-11-14 21:41:05 +0100 | <shapr> | Oh speaking of hakyll, I had a feature request to include the blog post body in my RSS feed. |
2024-11-14 21:40:25 +0100 | <guy_> | https://github.com/ChrisPenner/slick (which claims to be a simpler alternative to hakyll/jekyll) |
2024-11-14 21:40:25 +0100 | <guy_> | and |
2024-11-14 21:40:24 +0100 | <guy_> | rib (as a static site generator - sounds like a good alternative to hakyll) https://github.com/srid/rib |
2024-11-14 21:40:24 +0100 | <guy_> | this links; |
2024-11-14 21:40:23 +0100 | <guy_> | https://www.reddit.com/r/haskell/comments/i97lz7/is_there_something_similar_to_hakyll_using_shake/ |
2024-11-14 21:40:19 +0100 | <shapr> | I should stick to Swedish, my French has rusted away. |
2024-11-14 21:39:59 +0100 | <shapr> | guy_: oui, c'est ca |
2024-11-14 21:38:38 +0100 | <shapr> | sm: I'll pitch that link into the poscript. Also, I linked to your mastodon in the post, do you have some other preferred link target? |
2024-11-14 21:36:20 +0100 | <guy_> | https://neilmitchell.blogspot.com/2021/09/reflecting-on-shake-build-system.html |
2024-11-14 21:34:42 +0100 | <sm> | shapr: stack script example, if you want one ^ |
2024-11-14 21:33:01 +0100 | <sm> | https://github.com/simonmichael/hledger/blob/master/Shake.hs |
2024-11-14 21:32:12 +0100 | peterbecich | (~Thunderbi@syn-047-229-123-186.res.spectrum.com) peterbecich |
2024-11-14 21:31:58 +0100 | <c_wraith> | But it's not like I'm short on free time these days. I should take another shot at it. |
2024-11-14 21:31:48 +0100 | <sm> | but anything I have implemented in it has been rock solid and I never had to worry about it again |
2024-11-14 21:31:19 +0100 | <sm> | c_wraith I hear that. Even if you know make, Shake is not exactly a walk in the park to program, especially if you're not using regularly. |
2024-11-14 21:30:33 +0100 | <haskellbridge> | <Bowuigi> Yeah that's easier, otherwise try https://github.com/ggerganov/whisper.cpp which is not Python but C++ |
2024-11-14 21:30:00 +0100 | <guy_> | im going afk for ~20 mins to give people time to listen through, see you at about 10 too |
2024-11-14 21:29:13 +0100 | <guy_> | never mind! it would be most simple if people could just listen to the recording, save the the hassle! https://vocaroo.com/14nNu3Nm5FaV |
2024-11-14 21:28:42 +0100 | <guy_> | says it only builds out of the box with nixos... https://gitlab.com/ludflu/vad-audio |
2024-11-14 21:28:04 +0100 | <c_wraith> | also, I never really used make, so the process of learning how to use shake seemed large. Much of shake's documentation is very "you already know how to use make"-oriented. |
2024-11-14 21:26:14 +0100 | <guy_> | python* |
2024-11-14 21:26:09 +0100 | <guy_> | https://www.reddit.com/r/haskell/comments/102bxc1/voice_assistant_app_in_haskell/ |
2024-11-14 21:26:09 +0100 | <guy_> | hmm.. whisper is in pythos so thats inaccessible to me, i can find this blog post about a sort of haskell port |
2024-11-14 21:26:07 +0100 | <sm> | with a few caveats, like you can have only one shake file in a project directory and can run it only once at a time |
2024-11-14 21:26:03 +0100 | <shapr> | I am using pandoc to convert org-mode to html, but it's not pulling in warp, whew. |
2024-11-14 21:25:29 +0100 | <sm> | shake is what I switched to, I love it |
2024-11-14 21:25:13 +0100 | guy | (~guy@2a01:4b00:d007:ed00:81c3:85aa:e2c9:6027) (Ping timeout: 256 seconds) |
2024-11-14 21:25:08 +0100 | <c_wraith> | I thought about using shake instead of hakyll, but even for a small amount of code the porting process seemed huge. |
2024-11-14 21:25:03 +0100 | <haskellbridge> | <Bowuigi> There's a faster whisper project somewhere, lemme find the link |
2024-11-14 21:24:29 +0100 | <guy_> | thanks haskellbridge, ill have a see if i can find an easy interface to see if i can get a trascript together |
2024-11-14 21:24:03 +0100 | <guy_> | yeah, sorry about the format, thats currently the only available description i have |
2024-11-14 21:23:59 +0100 | <sm> | c_wraith: similar - I abandoned hakyll and now always use pandoc via cli rather than importing |
2024-11-14 21:23:55 +0100 | ash3en | (~Thunderbi@193.32.248.167) (Quit: ash3en) |
2024-11-14 21:23:53 +0100 | <haskellbridge> | <Bowuigi> guy_ The Whisper models are good |
2024-11-14 21:23:34 +0100 | <c_wraith> | shapr: you might luckily be on an older version of hakyll that didn't accidentally build warp for a single data type import! |
2024-11-14 21:23:33 +0100 | <shapr> | I don't have such a tool handy. |
2024-11-14 21:23:21 +0100 | <guy_> | it would be good to see what a GPT has to say on the subject |
2024-11-14 21:22:51 +0100 | <guy_> | shapr: not currently! it would be good if i had a voice to text tool, does anyone have a good tool for this? |
2024-11-14 21:22:43 +0100 | shapr | worriedly checks his blog dependencies |
2024-11-14 21:22:22 +0100 | <c_wraith> | pandoc and hakyll are... yeah. I patched hakyll to not accidentally build warp in CI (why did that need a patch?) and ripped pandoc out of the build pipeline entirely. |
2024-11-14 21:22:22 +0100 | <shapr> | guy_: I comprehend text the fastest, is there a transcript? |
2024-11-14 21:22:07 +0100 | <guy_> | (here for anyone that cant see the scrollup https://vocaroo.com/14nNu3Nm5FaV) |
2024-11-14 21:21:41 +0100 | <sm> | more stack trivia: don't miss `stack script --compile`, which will auto (re)compile the script, or run the compiled version if it already exists, for instant startup |