Newest at the top
| 2024-11-06 18:35:16 +0100 | briandaed | (~root@185.234.210.211.r.toneticgroup.pl) |
| 2024-11-06 18:31:36 +0100 | kuribas | (~user@ip-188-118-57-242.reverse.destiny.be) (Remote host closed the connection) |
| 2024-11-06 18:29:48 +0100 | ljdarj1 | ljdarj |
| 2024-11-06 18:29:48 +0100 | ljdarj | (~Thunderbi@user/ljdarj) (Ping timeout: 244 seconds) |
| 2024-11-06 18:27:32 +0100 | ljdarj1 | (~Thunderbi@user/ljdarj) ljdarj |
| 2024-11-06 18:19:18 +0100 | peterbecich | (~Thunderbi@syn-047-229-123-186.res.spectrum.com) peterbecich |
| 2024-11-06 18:13:52 +0100 | pabs3 | (~pabs3@user/pabs3) pabs3 |
| 2024-11-06 18:10:46 +0100 | jrm | (~jrm@user/jrm) jrm |
| 2024-11-06 18:09:57 +0100 | Guest7 | (~Guest7@syn-172-249-181-078.res.spectrum.com) (Ping timeout: 256 seconds) |
| 2024-11-06 18:09:17 +0100 | jrm | (~jrm@user/jrm) (Quit: ciao) |
| 2024-11-06 18:00:51 +0100 | pabs3 | (~pabs3@user/pabs3) (Ping timeout: 276 seconds) |
| 2024-11-06 17:51:57 +0100 | sprotte24 | (~sprotte24@p200300d16f45f600c5ad94218b2aa1c2.dip0.t-ipconnect.de) (Quit: Leaving) |
| 2024-11-06 17:48:16 +0100 | euleritian | (~euleritia@ip4d16fc38.dynamic.kabel-deutschland.de) |
| 2024-11-06 17:48:01 +0100 | euleritian | (~euleritia@dynamic-176-007-150-185.176.7.pool.telefonica.de) (Read error: Connection reset by peer) |
| 2024-11-06 17:47:08 +0100 | son0p | (~ff@186.119.84.155) son0p |
| 2024-11-06 17:44:48 +0100 | merijn | (~merijn@77.242.116.146) (Ping timeout: 265 seconds) |
| 2024-11-06 17:44:48 +0100 | chele | (~chele@user/chele) (Remote host closed the connection) |
| 2024-11-06 17:38:46 +0100 | Smiles | (uid551636@id-551636.lymington.irccloud.com) (Quit: Connection closed for inactivity) |
| 2024-11-06 17:33:27 +0100 | TonyStone | (~TonyStone@user/TonyStone) TonyStone |
| 2024-11-06 17:30:58 +0100 | tomboy64 | (~tomboy64@user/tomboy64) tomboy64 |
| 2024-11-06 17:30:35 +0100 | <Inst> | given certain events |
| 2024-11-06 17:30:27 +0100 | <Inst> | probably, and now is not a good time |
| 2024-11-06 17:30:19 +0100 | <EvanR> | or confused |
| 2024-11-06 17:30:14 +0100 | <EvanR> | you're misleading |
| 2024-11-06 17:29:08 +0100 | <Inst> | i mean that purely functional programming, as an advertising phrase, at least, is misleading |
| 2024-11-06 17:28:42 +0100 | <Inst> | erm, GHCup upkeep |
| 2024-11-06 17:28:20 +0100 | <Inst> | you didn't agree to the bet, so i can't try to cajole you into passing maerwald some money for GHC upkeep |
| 2024-11-06 17:28:06 +0100 | <Inst> | onlineapp.d(20): Error: `pure` function `onlineapp.bigPow` cannot call impure function `std.stdio.writefln!(char, BigInt).writefln` |
| 2024-11-06 17:27:23 +0100 | merijn | (~merijn@77.242.116.146) merijn |
| 2024-11-06 17:27:15 +0100 | <EvanR> | which is true |
| 2024-11-06 17:27:13 +0100 | <EvanR> | just that it's unpopular |
| 2024-11-06 17:27:01 +0100 | <EvanR> | I don't know what that refers to, but anyway, you're not supporting "pure functional programming is meaningless" |
| 2024-11-06 17:26:28 +0100 | <Inst> | if i win, will you donate to maerwald? |
| 2024-11-06 17:26:26 +0100 | merijn | (~merijn@77.242.116.146) (Ping timeout: 265 seconds) |
| 2024-11-06 17:26:13 +0100 | <EvanR> | I wager $10 that it's for documentation purposes and doesn't actually stop side effects |
| 2024-11-06 17:25:33 +0100 | <Inst> | https://tour.dlang.org/tour/en/gems/functional-programming#:~:text=Pure%20functions,functions%20wh… |
| 2024-11-06 17:25:31 +0100 | <Inst> | and yeah, D has a pure declaration for a function |
| 2024-11-06 17:24:42 +0100 | <Inst> | but iirc... oh wait, lisp macros, but generally languages don't have special support for pure functions |
| 2024-11-06 17:23:52 +0100 | <EvanR> | "concept of a pure function" was well known in lisp since forever |
| 2024-11-06 17:23:15 +0100 | <EvanR> | C++ of the 90s |
| 2024-11-06 17:23:09 +0100 | <EvanR> | refusing to look outside its C++ origins |
| 2024-11-06 17:22:54 +0100 | <EvanR> | D is a miserable pile of hacks and missed opportunities |
| 2024-11-06 17:22:48 +0100 | Guest7 | (~Guest7@syn-172-249-181-078.res.spectrum.com) |
| 2024-11-06 17:22:41 +0100 | <EvanR> | it does not |
| 2024-11-06 17:22:32 +0100 | <Inst> | I heard that D has a concept of pure function, but it's opt in instead of opt-out, maybe I'm wrong here? |
| 2024-11-06 17:22:30 +0100 | <EvanR> | all functions in haskell are pure so there's that |
| 2024-11-06 17:22:14 +0100 | <Inst> | iirc there are no more "mainstream" languages than Haskell that employ purity |
| 2024-11-06 17:22:03 +0100 | <EvanR> | because they never heard of the term "pure function" before |
| 2024-11-06 17:21:54 +0100 | <EvanR> | like haskell is purely functional because it's 100% functional, while closure is 40% functional, or something, and so not pure lol |
| 2024-11-06 17:21:50 +0100 | <Inst> | it's a bit gimmicky that purely here is a term of art, not the colloquial term |