Newest at the top
| 2024-11-05 17:26:24 +0100 | tromp | (~textual@92-110-219-57.cable.dynamic.v4.ziggo.nl) (Quit: My iMac has gone to sleep. ZZZzzz…) |
| 2024-11-05 17:25:02 +0100 | <institor> | i will shut up now |
| 2024-11-05 17:24:57 +0100 | <institor> | eh maybe i don't mean pointfree |
| 2024-11-05 17:24:41 +0100 | <institor> | s/lazy/too lazy |
| 2024-11-05 17:24:34 +0100 | <institor> | i suppose i am just lazy to find pointfree solutions |
| 2024-11-05 17:24:30 +0100 | euleritian | (~euleritia@77.22.252.56) |
| 2024-11-05 17:24:15 +0100 | <institor> | in any case i also use it liberally myself |
| 2024-11-05 17:24:13 +0100 | euleritian | (~euleritia@dynamic-176-006-148-028.176.6.pool.telefonica.de) (Read error: Connection reset by peer) |
| 2024-11-05 17:24:09 +0100 | <institor> | maybe |
| 2024-11-05 17:23:59 +0100 | <merijn> | Just not for gaining understanding of what you're doing if you don't already know :) |
| 2024-11-05 17:23:44 +0100 | <merijn> | I *love* do notation, it's amazing |
| 2024-11-05 17:23:32 +0100 | <merijn> | I disagree with that, tbh |
| 2024-11-05 17:23:27 +0100 | <institor> | it suggests there is too much orchestration going on |
| 2024-11-05 17:23:21 +0100 | <institor> | in fact i usually consider do notation a mild code smell |
| 2024-11-05 17:23:02 +0100 | <institor> | i agree with merijn |
| 2024-11-05 17:22:51 +0100 | <institor> | sorry, i don't believe in copy/paste |
| 2024-11-05 17:22:44 +0100 | <institor> | s/putSTr/putStr |
| 2024-11-05 17:22:40 +0100 | <institor> | putStr "Enter name: " >> getLine >>= (\name -> putStrLn $ "Hello " ++ name) |
| 2024-11-05 17:22:13 +0100 | <merijn> | In fact, for educational purposes I would recommend avoiding do notation |
| 2024-11-05 17:22:09 +0100 | <institor> | desugars to |
| 2024-11-05 17:22:07 +0100 | <institor> | putStrLn $ "Hello " ++ name |
| 2024-11-05 17:22:00 +0100 | <institor> | name <- getLine |
| 2024-11-05 17:21:56 +0100 | <institor> | putSTr "Enter name: " |
| 2024-11-05 17:21:51 +0100 | <institor> | foo = do |
| 2024-11-05 17:21:47 +0100 | <institor> | foo :: IO () |
| 2024-11-05 17:19:25 +0100 | <institor> | as a synopsis |
| 2024-11-05 17:19:22 +0100 | <institor> | Leonard26: you would do well to understand how `do` notation desugars into the bind operator |
| 2024-11-05 17:19:02 +0100 | <institor> | Leonard26: then they are only in scope in `main` |
| 2024-11-05 17:16:09 +0100 | lortabac | (~lortabac@2a01:e0a:541:b8f0:55ab:e185:7f81:54a4) (Quit: WeeChat 4.2.2) |
| 2024-11-05 17:11:54 +0100 | spew | (~spew@155.133.15.183) spew |
| 2024-11-05 17:08:55 +0100 | alexherbo2 | (~alexherbo@2a02-8440-3311-b70e-c993-5f39-72e6-f3a6.rev.sfr.net) (Remote host closed the connection) |
| 2024-11-05 17:07:49 +0100 | ZLima12 | (~zlima12@user/meow/ZLima12) (Ping timeout: 260 seconds) |
| 2024-11-05 17:04:45 +0100 | merijn | (~merijn@77.242.116.146) merijn |
| 2024-11-05 17:04:44 +0100 | tabaqui | (~root@91.73.194.130) tabaqui |
| 2024-11-05 16:59:09 +0100 | longlongdouble | (~longlongd@2405:201:5c16:135:7459:cd00:c885:3805) |
| 2024-11-05 16:58:36 +0100 | merijn | (~merijn@77.242.116.146) (Ping timeout: 272 seconds) |
| 2024-11-05 16:51:34 +0100 | tromp | (~textual@92-110-219-57.cable.dynamic.v4.ziggo.nl) |
| 2024-11-05 16:47:57 +0100 | Smiles | (uid551636@id-551636.lymington.irccloud.com) Smiles |
| 2024-11-05 16:45:18 +0100 | alp | (~alp@2001:861:e3d6:8f80:86cd:f9bc:2fcc:950e) |
| 2024-11-05 16:45:02 +0100 | <Leonard26> | I'll read on about `State` and `ReaderT`, thank you |
| 2024-11-05 16:43:50 +0100 | <Leonard26> | They are defined in main, row 148 and 156 |
| 2024-11-05 16:42:24 +0100 | <institor> | the names are just not in scope |
| 2024-11-05 16:42:01 +0100 | <institor> | what are you expecting these to be |
| 2024-11-05 16:41:56 +0100 | <institor> | on a more concrete level, `source` and `pipeline` simply aren't defined |
| 2024-11-05 16:41:54 +0100 | tromp | (~textual@92-110-219-57.cable.dynamic.v4.ziggo.nl) (Quit: My iMac has gone to sleep. ZZZzzz…) |
| 2024-11-05 16:41:45 +0100 | <institor> | gtk on windows huh... |
| 2024-11-05 16:41:11 +0100 | <geekosaur> | and use `StateT`/`ReaderT` to transparently pass it around as needed |
| 2024-11-05 16:40:45 +0100 | <geekosaur> | there are ways to do it, but we strongly prefer passing them in either `State` or `ReaderT` with a record of the "environment" (if they're mutable, it's `ReaderT Env IO` with `ENV` being a record of `IORef`s) |
| 2024-11-05 16:38:39 +0100 | <Leonard26> | But in Haskell I can't figure out a way to reproduce this =( |
| 2024-11-05 16:38:38 +0100 | <Leonard26> | static GstElement *pipeline; |