Newest at the top
| 2024-11-04 19:10:02 +0100 | gvg | (~dcd@user/gvg) (Ping timeout: 255 seconds) |
| 2024-11-04 19:08:17 +0100 | <tomsmeding> | that sample is indeed odd |
| 2024-11-04 19:08:12 +0100 | <briandaed> | yeah, moved from hoogle to fw/ids/ips whatever |
| 2024-11-04 19:07:44 +0100 | <int-e> | (which /may/ be easy to filter before they burden the CPU unduly but it's still work) |
| 2024-11-04 19:07:20 +0100 | <briandaed> | https://discourse.haskell.org/t/hoogle-appears-to-be-down/10408/21 |
| 2024-11-04 19:07:07 +0100 | <int-e> | and everything that looks like it accepts parameters gets hammered with attempts to do SQL injection |
| 2024-11-04 19:07:01 +0100 | <tomsmeding> | (link?) |
| 2024-11-04 19:06:54 +0100 | <briandaed> | I also don't suspect spam or malicious activities, rather some misconfigured tool, but I saw only limited sample on discourse |
| 2024-11-04 19:06:47 +0100 | ljdarj | (~Thunderbi@user/ljdarj) (Ping timeout: 265 seconds) |
| 2024-11-04 19:06:18 +0100 | <tomsmeding> | (and it's been up and linked to for more than a year now) |
| 2024-11-04 19:06:10 +0100 | <tomsmeding> | the playground doesn't get spam like that |
| 2024-11-04 19:06:05 +0100 | <tomsmeding> | and that happens enough times per second to bring the site to a crawl? |
| 2024-11-04 19:05:50 +0100 | <dolio> | From what I heard, it doesn't sound like dos. It sounds like the internet is full of bots who will search for things like "password" on any web form hoping to get lucky. |
| 2024-11-04 19:05:42 +0100 | <tomsmeding> | (though if it's really a DOS then it would be worth checking if it comes from a small number of IPs) |
| 2024-11-04 19:05:40 +0100 | <briandaed> | in my narrow mind spam is sending some useless messages (sometimes malicious), while ddos wants service to be down |
| 2024-11-04 19:04:35 +0100 | <tomsmeding> | is there a difference? |
| 2024-11-04 19:04:26 +0100 | <briandaed> | not sure if we should classify it as a spam or rather (d)dos |
| 2024-11-04 19:01:57 +0100 | <tomsmeding> | (if you know better: please let me know!) |
| 2024-11-04 19:01:57 +0100 | morb | (~morb@pool-108-41-100-120.nycmny.fios.verizon.net) (Ping timeout: 248 seconds) |
| 2024-11-04 19:01:19 +0100 | <tomsmeding> | (and, what's more, it's also counterproductive with things like CGNAT, or big schools having a small number of external IPs) |
| 2024-11-04 19:00:26 +0100 | <tomsmeding> | IP rate limiting is pointless with IPv6 |
| 2024-11-04 19:00:03 +0100 | <tomsmeding> | ultimately spam protection is just really quite hard without relying on internet backbone providers like cloudflare |
| 2024-11-04 18:57:29 +0100 | tzh | (~tzh@c-76-115-131-146.hsd1.or.comcast.net) tzh |
| 2024-11-04 18:57:23 +0100 | morb | (~morb@pool-108-41-100-120.nycmny.fios.verizon.net) |
| 2024-11-04 18:55:13 +0100 | Digitteknohippie | (~user@user/digit) (Ping timeout: 252 seconds) |
| 2024-11-04 18:54:53 +0100 | <briandaed> | more core/threads would help? |
| 2024-11-04 18:54:19 +0100 | <sclv> | i think its compute bound and suspect its just the hoogle code isn't super load efficient on some things |
| 2024-11-04 18:53:45 +0100 | <briandaed> | sclv are these spam queries network(io) bound? |
| 2024-11-04 18:44:28 +0100 | alp | (~alp@2001:861:e3d6:8f80:8ee1:f46d:3f90:227c) |
| 2024-11-04 18:31:39 +0100 | Digitteknohippie | (~user@user/digit) Digit |
| 2024-11-04 18:31:38 +0100 | Digit | (~user@user/digit) (Ping timeout: 245 seconds) |
| 2024-11-04 18:30:45 +0100 | LainExperiments | (~LainExper@user/LainExperiments) LainExperiments |
| 2024-11-04 18:18:25 +0100 | Leonard26 | (~Leonard26@49.236.10.26) (Quit: Client closed) |
| 2024-11-04 18:17:29 +0100 | target_i | (~target_i@user/target-i/x-6023099) (Quit: leaving) |
| 2024-11-04 18:14:31 +0100 | Tuplanolla | (~Tuplanoll@91-159-69-59.elisa-laajakaista.fi) Tuplanolla |
| 2024-11-04 18:08:12 +0100 | machinedgod | (~machinedg@d108-173-18-100.abhsia.telus.net) (Ping timeout: 244 seconds) |
| 2024-11-04 18:01:12 +0100 | hiredman | (~hiredman@frontier1.downey.family) hiredman |
| 2024-11-04 18:00:55 +0100 | LainExperiments | (~LainExper@user/LainExperiments) (Quit: Client closed) |
| 2024-11-04 18:00:54 +0100 | morb | (~morb@pool-108-41-100-120.nycmny.fios.verizon.net) (Ping timeout: 246 seconds) |
| 2024-11-04 17:56:34 +0100 | morb | (~morb@pool-108-41-100-120.nycmny.fios.verizon.net) |
| 2024-11-04 17:55:51 +0100 | <sclv> | what we need is a skilled admin to join us and help configure it to knock out the spam -- or maybe someone to work on making the code more efficient to handle load, or both :-) |
| 2024-11-04 17:52:39 +0100 | comerijn | (~merijn@77.242.116.146) (Ping timeout: 260 seconds) |
| 2024-11-04 17:48:54 +0100 | spew | (~spew@201.141.99.170) spew |
| 2024-11-04 17:46:47 +0100 | <haskellbridge> | <hellwolf> or, we live with chances, which kinda worked too |
| 2024-11-04 17:46:32 +0100 | <haskellbridge> | I think we can donate some money and setup a AWS WAF for it... shouldn't cost < $30 dollar |
| 2024-11-04 17:46:32 +0100 | <haskellbridge> | <hellwolf> > It's apparently getting hit by a bunch of bot activity. |
| 2024-11-04 17:44:44 +0100 | euphores | (~SASL_euph@user/euphores) euphores |
| 2024-11-04 17:43:54 +0100 | <geekosaur> | I haven't heard any complaints in the past week, so I guess it's back now? |
| 2024-11-04 17:43:54 +0100 | <dolio> | It's apparently getting hit by a bunch of bot activity. |
| 2024-11-04 17:43:26 +0100 | rvalue- | rvalue |