2024/09/15

Newest at the top

2024-09-15 18:09:30 +0200econo_(uid147250@id-147250.tinside.irccloud.com)
2024-09-15 18:07:49 +0200 <haskellbridge> <thirdofmay18081814goya> what is the usual model of parallelism and concurrency when we model computations with monads?
2024-09-15 18:01:55 +0200merijn(~merijn@204-220-045-062.dynamic.caiway.nl) (Ping timeout: 264 seconds)
2024-09-15 17:59:42 +0200Inst_(~Inst@user/Inst)
2024-09-15 17:57:21 +0200merijn(~merijn@204-220-045-062.dynamic.caiway.nl)
2024-09-15 17:46:01 +0200merijn(~merijn@204-220-045-062.dynamic.caiway.nl) (Ping timeout: 252 seconds)
2024-09-15 17:41:30 +0200merijn(~merijn@204-220-045-062.dynamic.caiway.nl)
2024-09-15 17:39:54 +0200rosco(~rosco@175.136.158.234)
2024-09-15 17:34:22 +0200tromp(~textual@92-110-219-57.cable.dynamic.v4.ziggo.nl)
2024-09-15 17:27:48 +0200merijn(~merijn@204-220-045-062.dynamic.caiway.nl) (Ping timeout: 252 seconds)
2024-09-15 17:23:18 +0200merijn(~merijn@204-220-045-062.dynamic.caiway.nl)
2024-09-15 17:18:10 +0200athan(~athan@syn-098-153-145-140.biz.spectrum.com)
2024-09-15 17:11:36 +0200shawwwn(sid6132@id-6132.helmsley.irccloud.com)
2024-09-15 17:11:27 +0200merijn(~merijn@204-220-045-062.dynamic.caiway.nl) (Ping timeout: 246 seconds)
2024-09-15 17:09:23 +0200tromp(~textual@92-110-219-57.cable.dynamic.v4.ziggo.nl) (Quit: My iMac has gone to sleep. ZZZzzz…)
2024-09-15 17:08:37 +0200swamp_(~zmt00@user/zmt00) (Ping timeout: 252 seconds)
2024-09-15 17:07:54 +0200misterfish(~misterfis@84.53.85.146) (Ping timeout: 252 seconds)
2024-09-15 17:06:59 +0200merijn(~merijn@204-220-045-062.dynamic.caiway.nl)
2024-09-15 17:05:07 +0200zmt00(~zmt00@user/zmt00)
2024-09-15 16:56:54 +0200euleritian(~euleritia@ip4d16fc38.dynamic.kabel-deutschland.de)
2024-09-15 16:56:29 +0200euleritian(~euleritia@dynamic-176-006-143-017.176.6.pool.telefonica.de) (Read error: Connection reset by peer)
2024-09-15 16:54:32 +0200euleritian(~euleritia@dynamic-176-006-143-017.176.6.pool.telefonica.de)
2024-09-15 16:54:07 +0200merijn(~merijn@204-220-045-062.dynamic.caiway.nl) (Ping timeout: 264 seconds)
2024-09-15 16:53:42 +0200spew(~spew@201.141.99.170)
2024-09-15 16:53:27 +0200emaczen`(~user@75-98-148-133.cpe.safelink.net) (Ping timeout: 276 seconds)
2024-09-15 16:53:24 +0200shawwwn(sid6132@id-6132.helmsley.irccloud.com) (Ping timeout: 260 seconds)
2024-09-15 16:53:18 +0200emaczen(~user@user/emaczen) (Ping timeout: 272 seconds)
2024-09-15 16:52:36 +0200weary-traveler(~user@user/user363627)
2024-09-15 16:52:14 +0200euleritian(~euleritia@dynamic-176-002-004-162.176.2.pool.telefonica.de) (Ping timeout: 265 seconds)
2024-09-15 16:49:24 +0200merijn(~merijn@204-220-045-062.dynamic.caiway.nl)
2024-09-15 16:49:11 +0200Sciencentistguy4Sciencentistguy
2024-09-15 16:49:11 +0200Sciencentistguy(~sciencent@hacksoc/ordinary-member) (Ping timeout: 252 seconds)
2024-09-15 16:48:48 +0200 <geekosaur> vi was written on 80s-style UNIX engineering workstations with big keyboards, so they had dedicated arrow pads
2024-09-15 16:48:22 +0200 <geekosaur> the idea of the numpad turning into an arrow pad was a hack by the original IBM PC so they could make a more compact keyboard
2024-09-15 16:48:20 +0200 <tomsmeding> I never understood why one would want what is today "num lock off"
2024-09-15 16:47:58 +0200 <tomsmeding> good
2024-09-15 16:47:55 +0200 <geekosaur> the former
2024-09-15 16:47:48 +0200 <tomsmeding> "no num lock" was the numpad just always numbers, or no numpad at all?
2024-09-15 16:47:28 +0200 <tomsmeding> then it's a risk, indeed
2024-09-15 16:47:25 +0200 <geekosaur> (no num lock though)
2024-09-15 16:47:20 +0200 <geekosaur> yes
2024-09-15 16:47:19 +0200Sciencentistguy4(~sciencent@hacksoc/ordinary-member)
2024-09-15 16:47:03 +0200 <tomsmeding> did those keyboards have caps lock, in the time that vi's command set was designed?
2024-09-15 16:46:58 +0200 <geekosaur> original vi actually had a semi-rational command set design
2024-09-15 16:46:36 +0200 <geekosaur> so (a) it's doubled (b) `z` doesn't do anything useful to reduce chances of hitting `Z` instead
2024-09-15 16:46:31 +0200dyniec(~dyniec@dybiec.info)
2024-09-15 16:46:24 +0200 <tomsmeding> I z
2024-09-15 16:46:12 +0200 <geekosaur> right, the worry was that `ZZ` isn't
2024-09-15 16:45:56 +0200 <tomsmeding> most z actions are harmless, though
2024-09-15 16:45:55 +0200misterfish(~misterfis@84.53.85.146)