Newest at the top
| 2025-12-18 01:05:13 +0100 | merijn | (~merijn@host-cl.cgnat-g.v4.dfn.nl) merijn |
| 2025-12-18 01:04:05 +0100 | xff0x | (~xff0x@2405:6580:b080:900:1f37:fc57:df55:8ce4) (Quit: xff0x) |
| 2025-12-18 01:00:54 +0100 | humasect | (~humasect@dyn-192-249-132-90.nexicom.net) (Remote host closed the connection) |
| 2025-12-18 00:58:51 +0100 | mange | (~mange@user/mange) mange |
| 2025-12-18 00:56:09 +0100 | <c_wraith> | Um. Why is mapAccumL's strictness like that? (you can only ensure that the state value is evaluated at each step by connecting it to the mapped value and ensuring you you examine all the mapped values before the final state) |
| 2025-12-18 00:53:55 +0100 | merijn | (~merijn@host-cl.cgnat-g.v4.dfn.nl) (Ping timeout: 240 seconds) |
| 2025-12-18 00:53:09 +0100 | tromp | (~textual@2001:1c00:3487:1b00:681b:ee7b:c126:c8ee) (Quit: My iMac has gone to sleep. ZZZzzz…) |
| 2025-12-18 00:49:23 +0100 | merijn | (~merijn@host-cl.cgnat-g.v4.dfn.nl) merijn |
| 2025-12-18 00:41:25 +0100 | Square2 | (~Square@user/square) (Ping timeout: 246 seconds) |
| 2025-12-18 00:38:44 +0100 | Square | (~Square4@user/square) Square |
| 2025-12-18 00:38:15 +0100 | merijn | (~merijn@host-cl.cgnat-g.v4.dfn.nl) (Ping timeout: 240 seconds) |
| 2025-12-18 00:35:53 +0100 | ljdarj1 | ljdarj |
| 2025-12-18 00:35:53 +0100 | ljdarj | (~Thunderbi@user/ljdarj) (Ping timeout: 244 seconds) |
| 2025-12-18 00:34:24 +0100 | ljdarj1 | (~Thunderbi@user/ljdarj) ljdarj |
| 2025-12-18 00:33:35 +0100 | merijn | (~merijn@host-cl.cgnat-g.v4.dfn.nl) merijn |
| 2025-12-18 00:29:23 +0100 | anpad | (~pandeyan@user/anpad) anpad |
| 2025-12-18 00:26:43 +0100 | anpad | (~pandeyan@user/anpad) (Quit: ZNC 1.10.1 - https://znc.in) |
| 2025-12-18 00:25:40 +0100 | CiaoSen | (~Jura@2a02:8071:64e1:da0:5a47:caff:fe78:33db) (Ping timeout: 246 seconds) |
| 2025-12-18 00:22:31 +0100 | merijn | (~merijn@host-cl.cgnat-g.v4.dfn.nl) (Ping timeout: 246 seconds) |
| 2025-12-18 00:22:13 +0100 | Sgeo | (~Sgeo@user/sgeo) Sgeo |
| 2025-12-18 00:17:48 +0100 | merijn | (~merijn@host-cl.cgnat-g.v4.dfn.nl) merijn |
| 2025-12-18 00:12:48 +0100 | lambda_gibbon | (~lambda_gi@208.83.175.39) |
| 2025-12-18 00:09:58 +0100 | lambda_gibbon | (~lambda_gi@208.83.175.39) (Ping timeout: 255 seconds) |
| 2025-12-18 00:06:35 +0100 | merijn | (~merijn@host-cl.cgnat-g.v4.dfn.nl) (Ping timeout: 240 seconds) |
| 2025-12-18 00:02:00 +0100 | merijn | (~merijn@host-cl.cgnat-g.v4.dfn.nl) merijn |
| 2025-12-17 23:57:10 +0100 | somemathguy | (~somemathg@user/somemathguy) somemathguy |
| 2025-12-17 23:55:54 +0100 | weary-traveler | (~user@user/user363627) user363627 |
| 2025-12-17 23:54:05 +0100 | weary-traveler | (~user@user/user363627) (Remote host closed the connection) |
| 2025-12-17 23:50:42 +0100 | merijn | (~merijn@host-cl.cgnat-g.v4.dfn.nl) (Ping timeout: 265 seconds) |
| 2025-12-17 23:49:11 +0100 | ljdarj | (~Thunderbi@user/ljdarj) ljdarj |
| 2025-12-17 23:48:02 +0100 | humasect | (~humasect@dyn-192-249-132-90.nexicom.net) |
| 2025-12-17 23:43:57 +0100 | merijn | (~merijn@host-cl.cgnat-g.v4.dfn.nl) merijn |
| 2025-12-17 23:39:34 +0100 | humasect | (~humasect@dyn-192-249-132-90.nexicom.net) (Ping timeout: 244 seconds) |
| 2025-12-17 23:37:46 +0100 | michalz | (~michalz@185.246.207.193) (Remote host closed the connection) |
| 2025-12-17 23:37:39 +0100 | Lycurgus | (~juan@user/Lycurgus) (Quit: alsoknownas.renjuan.org ( juan@acm.org )) |
| 2025-12-17 23:35:04 +0100 | humasect | (~humasect@dyn-192-249-132-90.nexicom.net) humasect |
| 2025-12-17 23:34:16 +0100 | trickard_ | trickard |
| 2025-12-17 23:33:37 +0100 | merijn | (~merijn@host-cl.cgnat-g.v4.dfn.nl) (Ping timeout: 264 seconds) |
| 2025-12-17 23:29:59 +0100 | yaroot | (~yaroot@2400:4052:ac0:d901:1cf4:2aff:fe51:c04c) yaroot |
| 2025-12-17 23:28:15 +0100 | merijn | (~merijn@host-cl.cgnat-g.v4.dfn.nl) merijn |
| 2025-12-17 23:18:58 +0100 | <haskellbridge> | <Liamzee> and let the user check what they want |
| 2025-12-17 23:18:49 +0100 | <haskellbridge> | <Liamzee> i mean there's a reasonable chance it won't segfault, otherwise, build both direct access and typed process versions of the same thing |
| 2025-12-17 23:18:01 +0100 | target_i | (~target_i@user/target-i/x-6023099) (Quit: leaving) |
| 2025-12-17 23:17:50 +0100 | <haskellbridge> | <Liamzee> i'm currently trying to port compression libs and a parquet reader |
| 2025-12-17 23:17:43 +0100 | merijn | (~merijn@host-cl.cgnat-g.v4.dfn.nl) (Ping timeout: 264 seconds) |
| 2025-12-17 23:17:06 +0100 | <int-e> | you could call into C code that doesn't segfault |
| 2025-12-17 23:16:22 +0100 | <haskellbridge> | <Liamzee> i.e, if you use C FFI, you always have to put up with, either a, spawning a new process so the C can blow up on itself, or b, having unrecoverable exceptions? |
| 2025-12-17 23:15:17 +0100 | yaroot | (~yaroot@p3747022-ipxg13101souka.saitama.ocn.ne.jp) (Ping timeout: 244 seconds) |
| 2025-12-17 23:15:15 +0100 | <haskellbridge> | <Liamzee> i have to used typedprocess to dodge C segfaults? |
| 2025-12-17 23:15:04 +0100 | <haskellbridge> | <Liamzee> this is nuts |