Newest at the top
| 2024-05-17 21:57:31 +0200 | ChanServ | +v haskellbridge |
| 2024-05-17 21:57:31 +0200 | haskellbridge | (~haskellbr@syn-069-135-003-034.biz.spectrum.com) |
| 2024-05-17 21:56:52 +0200 | haskellbridge | (~haskellbr@syn-069-135-003-034.biz.spectrum.com) (Remote host closed the connection) |
| 2024-05-17 21:56:43 +0200 | sord937 | (~sord937@gateway/tor-sasl/sord937) (Quit: sord937) |
| 2024-05-17 21:54:23 +0200 | califax | (~califax@user/califx) |
| 2024-05-17 21:52:28 +0200 | califax | (~califax@user/califx) (Remote host closed the connection) |
| 2024-05-17 21:49:55 +0200 | ChanServ | +v haskellbridge |
| 2024-05-17 21:49:55 +0200 | haskellbridge | (~haskellbr@syn-069-135-003-034.biz.spectrum.com) |
| 2024-05-17 21:48:42 +0200 | <EvanR> | an embarrassment of riches |
| 2024-05-17 21:48:28 +0200 | <EvanR> | there's like 50 different unicode =>'s xD |
| 2024-05-17 21:45:50 +0200 | <ncf> | looks like a natural transformation to me, but => is already taken |
| 2024-05-17 21:41:57 +0200 | peterbecich | (~Thunderbi@syn-047-229-123-186.res.spectrum.com) (Ping timeout: 256 seconds) |
| 2024-05-17 21:40:52 +0200 | <[Leary]> | I suppose the most direct unicode name would be: cs ⊢ c := forall x. cs x => c x |
| 2024-05-17 21:33:23 +0200 | emmanuelux | (~emmanuelu@user/emmanuelux) |
| 2024-05-17 21:28:41 +0200 | peterbecich | (~Thunderbi@syn-047-229-123-186.res.spectrum.com) |
| 2024-05-17 21:20:12 +0200 | euphores | (~SASL_euph@user/euphores) |
| 2024-05-17 21:14:40 +0200 | euphores | (~SASL_euph@user/euphores) (Quit: Leaving.) |
| 2024-05-17 21:10:58 +0200 | fliife | (~fliife@user/fliife) |
| 2024-05-17 21:10:13 +0200 | waleee | (~waleee@h-176-10-144-38.NA.cust.bahnhof.se) |
| 2024-05-17 21:08:53 +0200 | ezzieyguywuf | (~Unknown@user/ezzieyguywuf) |
| 2024-05-17 21:07:37 +0200 | ezzieyguywuf | (~Unknown@user/ezzieyguywuf) (Ping timeout: 268 seconds) |
| 2024-05-17 21:00:47 +0200 | raym | (~ray@user/raym) |
| 2024-05-17 20:59:56 +0200 | <glguy> | ncf: yeah, maybe the other way around makes more sense; I was still in the list of constraints mindset |
| 2024-05-17 20:59:26 +0200 | califax | (~califax@user/califx) |
| 2024-05-17 20:58:43 +0200 | y04nn | (~username@2a03:1b20:8:f011::e10d) |
| 2024-05-17 20:57:46 +0200 | califax | (~califax@user/califx) (Remote host closed the connection) |
| 2024-05-17 20:57:09 +0200 | suvid | (~suvid@103.144.93.164) (Remote host closed the connection) |
| 2024-05-17 20:57:02 +0200 | suvid | (~suvid@103.144.93.164) |
| 2024-05-17 20:55:55 +0200 | JimL | (~quassel@89.162.16.26) |
| 2024-05-17 20:55:35 +0200 | JimL | (~quassel@89.162.16.26) (Quit: https://quassel-irc.org - Chat comfortably. Anywhere.) |
| 2024-05-17 20:51:21 +0200 | <ncf> | like, instead of saying "the cs objects are a subset of the Show objects" (cs ⊆ Show) you're saying "Show is a member of the list of constraints represented by cs, so that you can project it out" (Show ⊆ cs) |
| 2024-05-17 20:49:34 +0200 | <ncf> | oh no i see it's a projection |
| 2024-05-17 20:49:07 +0200 | raym | (~ray@user/raym) (Ping timeout: 268 seconds) |
| 2024-05-17 20:48:36 +0200 | <ncf> | your ⊆ is backwards |
| 2024-05-17 20:46:50 +0200 | <glguy> | Fwiw I don't recommend using either this or the previous version. It's just exploring the possible |
| 2024-05-17 20:46:00 +0200 | <[Leary]> | glguy: Nice, looks a bit prettier at least. |
| 2024-05-17 20:43:57 +0200 | JimL | (~quassel@89.162.16.26) |
| 2024-05-17 20:43:39 +0200 | JimL | (~quassel@89.162.16.26) (Quit: https://quassel-irc.org - Chat comfortably. Anywhere.) |
| 2024-05-17 20:42:12 +0200 | <glguy> | [Leary]: adapted https://github.com/glguy/operations/blob/quantifiedconstraints/src/Example.hs |
| 2024-05-17 20:40:53 +0200 | califax | (~califax@user/califx) |
| 2024-05-17 20:39:40 +0200 | califax | (~califax@user/califx) (Remote host closed the connection) |
| 2024-05-17 20:38:38 +0200 | <ph88> | glguy, thanks |
| 2024-05-17 20:34:52 +0200 | petrichor | (~znc-user@user/petrichor) |
| 2024-05-17 20:34:39 +0200 | <[Leary]> | ph88: I can't help much when I don't know just what it is you're struggling to achieve---the line where you've commented ?? was already, err, /mysterious/ to me from the start. That said, you probably want `type c <: cs = (forall x. cs x => c x) :: Constraint` (library-side) and `instance GetMessage <: cs => GetMessage (Entity cs)` (user-side). |
| 2024-05-17 20:34:31 +0200 | <glguy> | ph88: you need '[Op1] |
| 2024-05-17 20:33:35 +0200 | califax | (~califax@user/califx) |
| 2024-05-17 20:31:51 +0200 | petrichor | (~znc-user@user/petrichor) (Ping timeout: 268 seconds) |
| 2024-05-17 20:31:32 +0200 | <ph88> | glguy, this type checks https://play.haskell.org/saved/EAupqGhV but it carries Op2 into class of Op1 .. they need to be separate |
| 2024-05-17 20:31:29 +0200 | califax | (~califax@user/califx) (Remote host closed the connection) |
| 2024-05-17 20:30:06 +0200 | <ph88> | glguy, i adapted your code. It works with 2 constraints. Why does it fail with one? https://play.haskell.org/saved/EAupqGhV |