Newest at the top
| 2025-12-04 21:05:53 +0100 | Googulator15 | (~Googulato@2a01-036d-0106-479c-d9ec-010d-f188-ffcb.pool6.digikabel.hu) |
| 2025-12-04 21:05:44 +0100 | Googulator15 | (~Googulato@2a01-036d-0106-479c-d9ec-010d-f188-ffcb.pool6.digikabel.hu) (Quit: Client closed) |
| 2025-12-04 21:04:51 +0100 | lambda_gibbon | (~lambda_gi@208.83.175.39) |
| 2025-12-04 21:04:00 +0100 | pavonia | (~user@user/siracusa) siracusa |
| 2025-12-04 20:58:44 +0100 | bggd | (~bgg@2a01:e0a:fd5:f510:9b09:80f:2f26:e3ad) (Quit: std::move) |
| 2025-12-04 20:56:59 +0100 | peterbecich | (~Thunderbi@172.222.148.214) peterbecich |
| 2025-12-04 20:52:58 +0100 | Pixi | (~Pixi@user/pixi) Pixi |
| 2025-12-04 20:52:41 +0100 | Pixi | (~Pixi@user/pixi) (Quit: Leaving) |
| 2025-12-04 20:49:00 +0100 | Lord_of_Life | (~Lord@user/lord-of-life/x-2819915) Lord_of_Life |
| 2025-12-04 20:41:05 +0100 | TypesWithAHammer | gAy_Dragon |
| 2025-12-04 20:40:22 +0100 | gAy_Dragon | TypesWithAHammer |
| 2025-12-04 20:39:49 +0100 | lambda_gibbon | (~lambda_gi@208.83.175.39) (Ping timeout: 246 seconds) |
| 2025-12-04 20:36:37 +0100 | dhil | (~dhil@5.151.29.139) (Quit: Leaving) |
| 2025-12-04 20:34:55 +0100 | Square2 | (~Square4@user/square) (Ping timeout: 246 seconds) |
| 2025-12-04 20:30:37 +0100 | Lord_of_Life | (~Lord@user/lord-of-life/x-2819915) (Ping timeout: 264 seconds) |
| 2025-12-04 20:30:12 +0100 | <EvanR> | redacted |
| 2025-12-04 20:30:02 +0100 | xnyhps | (~xnyhps@s.xnyhps.nl) (Remote host closed the connection) |
| 2025-12-04 20:28:33 +0100 | <monochrom> | haha |
| 2025-12-04 20:27:56 +0100 | <ski> | rebased ? |
| 2025-12-04 20:27:38 +0100 | <tomsmeding> | fortunately -- contrary to segfaultfizzbuzz's wishes -- history is being revised regularly :) |
| 2025-12-04 20:27:18 +0100 | AlexZenon_2 | AlexZenon |
| 2025-12-04 20:26:25 +0100 | <tomsmeding> | it seems that now is really the time that I've not used C for a long enough time that I forget basic syntax like this |
| 2025-12-04 20:25:01 +0100 | <int-e> | . o O ( it's called "revising history", I learned today ) |
| 2025-12-04 20:21:05 +0100 | <tomsmeding> | :) |
| 2025-12-04 20:21:00 +0100 | <monochrom> | Your brain makes sense, therefore you don't understand a poor syntax choice in C. :) |
| 2025-12-04 20:20:51 +0100 | <tomsmeding> | (I had to pass -std=c99 -pedantic to get gcc to complain about it) |
| 2025-12-04 20:20:38 +0100 | <tomsmeding> | 2. what is my brain doing |
| 2025-12-04 20:20:33 +0100 | <tomsmeding> | 1. you're right |
| 2025-12-04 20:20:19 +0100 | <tomsmeding> | or wait what |
| 2025-12-04 20:20:15 +0100 | <tomsmeding> | TIL |
| 2025-12-04 20:19:57 +0100 | <monochrom> | But C didn't have the o, you go straight to 0777 |
| 2025-12-04 20:19:15 +0100 | <tomsmeding> | I'd rather expect that all mentioned examples got 0o from C :p |
| 2025-12-04 20:18:42 +0100 | <tomsmeding> | mauke: uh, what about C? |
| 2025-12-04 20:16:55 +0100 | <tomsmeding> | got the language wrong, but at least it exists in a common language :p |
| 2025-12-04 20:16:18 +0100 | <tomsmeding> | int-e: Swift seems to have ..< with the meaning I had in mind |
| 2025-12-04 20:15:10 +0100 | <tomsmeding> | int-e: I could have _sworn_ rust had ..< |
| 2025-12-04 20:11:47 +0100 | gehmehgeh | gmg |
| 2025-12-04 20:08:21 +0100 | <mauke> | but the exponent is required |
| 2025-12-04 20:08:15 +0100 | <mauke> | kind of. perl supports 0o0.4p0 |
| 2025-12-04 20:07:12 +0100 | ski | . o O ( `0o0.4' ) |
| 2025-12-04 20:05:13 +0100 | <int-e> | But not Pike (which is another branch of LPC), so I think the caveat is important. |
| 2025-12-04 20:03:40 +0100 | <int-e> | Rust too. The aforementioned LPC too (at least in its modern ldmud dialect). |
| 2025-12-04 20:03:39 +0100 | <c_wraith> | actually, I guessed it based on the syntax provided in the binary literals extension rather than looking for a reference. at least things are consistent |
| 2025-12-04 20:03:29 +0100 | <mauke> | nice |
| 2025-12-04 20:02:03 +0100 | <int-e> | let's see.. Python 3 does it and forbids leading zeros in decimal literals on top of that |
| 2025-12-04 19:59:02 +0100 | <mauke> | do any other programming languages (outside of Perl/Haskell) support 0o notation? |
| 2025-12-04 19:57:46 +0100 | <haskellbridge> | <loonycyborg> Probably it's possible to write a function that will map on the element number in tuple that you specify as type level Natural :P |
| 2025-12-04 19:57:36 +0100 | <mauke> | 0o (pronounced "uh-oh") |
| 2025-12-04 19:56:35 +0100 | <monochrom> | heh |
| 2025-12-04 19:56:19 +0100 | <c_wraith> | I found myself looking for how to write octal literals for the first time today. after almost 20 years using Haskell. |