Newest at the top
2024-05-01 21:02:40 +0200 | michalz | (~michalz@185.246.207.218) (Client Quit) |
2024-05-01 21:00:51 +0200 | michalz | (~michalz@185.246.207.218) |
2024-05-01 20:52:57 +0200 | euleritian | (~euleritia@ip4d16fc38.dynamic.kabel-deutschland.de) |
2024-05-01 20:52:32 +0200 | euleritian | (~euleritia@ip4d16fc38.dynamic.kabel-deutschland.de) (Read error: Connection reset by peer) |
2024-05-01 20:52:32 +0200 | danza | (~francesco@151.19.252.90) (Ping timeout: 260 seconds) |
2024-05-01 20:51:07 +0200 | euleritian | (~euleritia@ip4d16fc38.dynamic.kabel-deutschland.de) |
2024-05-01 20:50:16 +0200 | euleritian | (~euleritia@ip4d16fc38.dynamic.kabel-deutschland.de) (Read error: Connection reset by peer) |
2024-05-01 20:40:53 +0200 | peterbecich | (~Thunderbi@syn-047-229-123-186.res.spectrum.com) (Ping timeout: 268 seconds) |
2024-05-01 20:39:23 +0200 | dfip^ | (~cd@c-98-242-74-66.hsd1.ga.comcast.net) (Remote host closed the connection) |
2024-05-01 20:38:12 +0200 | <k``> | Cool. |
2024-05-01 20:38:05 +0200 | <lambdabot> | 0 |
2024-05-01 20:38:03 +0200 | <k``> | > bit 128 :: Int |
2024-05-01 20:37:38 +0200 | <lambdabot> | 0 |
2024-05-01 20:37:37 +0200 | <k``> | > shiftR 1 128 :: Int |
2024-05-01 20:37:32 +0200 | tromp | (~textual@92-110-219-57.cable.dynamic.v4.ziggo.nl) |
2024-05-01 20:37:17 +0200 | <lambdabot> | 0 |
2024-05-01 20:37:16 +0200 | <k``> | > shiftL 1 128 :: Int -- Simon says |
2024-05-01 20:36:53 +0200 | <k``> | shiftL 1 128 :: Int |
2024-05-01 20:36:21 +0200 | <lambdabot> | 0 |
2024-05-01 20:36:20 +0200 | <k``> | > shiftL 1 64 :: Int64 |
2024-05-01 20:35:56 +0200 | <lambdabot> | 0 |
2024-05-01 20:35:55 +0200 | <k``> | > shiftL 1 64 :: Word64 |
2024-05-01 20:34:23 +0200 | tromp | (~textual@92-110-219-57.cable.dynamic.v4.ziggo.nl) (Quit: My iMac has gone to sleep. ZZZzzz…) |
2024-05-01 20:33:53 +0200 | justsomeguy | (~justsomeg@user/justsomeguy) (Quit: WeeChat 3.6) |
2024-05-01 20:32:46 +0200 | <k``> | Oh wow. Looks like it's a documentation issue... |
2024-05-01 20:30:54 +0200 | <geekosaur> | the docs look reversed for unsafeShiftR vs. shiftR (compare shiftL) |
2024-05-01 20:30:52 +0200 | <ncf> | i knew he was never gonna let me down |
2024-05-01 20:30:00 +0200 | danza | (~francesco@151.19.252.90) |
2024-05-01 20:29:58 +0200 | <c_wraith> | he's even released new stuff recently. and it's quite good. |
2024-05-01 20:29:27 +0200 | <monochrom> | Rick Astley actually has his own youtube channel and posts his official MVs. I be damned. |
2024-05-01 20:27:19 +0200 | mrmr1553343 | (~mrmr@user/mrmr) |
2024-05-01 20:24:57 +0200 | <k``> | Seems like the processor issues make sense for `unsafeShiftR`, but maybe not `shiftR`. And the inconsistency between R and L is still unexplained... |
2024-05-01 20:24:55 +0200 | <dolio> | Seconded. |
2024-05-01 20:24:17 +0200 | <probie> | I think this is a better monad video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dQw4w9WgXcQ |
2024-05-01 20:21:52 +0200 | mrmr1553343 | (~mrmr@user/mrmr) (Ping timeout: 256 seconds) |
2024-05-01 20:20:48 +0200 | <dolio> | 15 minutes |
2024-05-01 20:17:40 +0200 | <monochrom> | How long is it? |
2024-05-01 20:13:20 +0200 | peterbecich | (~Thunderbi@syn-047-229-123-186.res.spectrum.com) |
2024-05-01 20:12:31 +0200 | <ncf> | i'm sure it's excellent since it starts with "the absolute best" |
2024-05-01 20:11:29 +0200 | <justsomeguy> | What do you guys think of this monad video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C2w45qRc3aU ? |
2024-05-01 20:05:51 +0200 | tromp | (~textual@92-110-219-57.cable.dynamic.v4.ziggo.nl) |
2024-05-01 20:05:34 +0200 | gaff | (~gaff@49.207.212.165) () |
2024-05-01 20:04:02 +0200 | hseg | (~gesh@77.137.75.224) |
2024-05-01 19:59:48 +0200 | justsomeguy | (~justsomeg@user/justsomeguy) |
2024-05-01 19:58:04 +0200 | tromp | (~textual@92-110-219-57.cable.dynamic.v4.ziggo.nl) (Quit: My iMac has gone to sleep. ZZZzzz…) |
2024-05-01 19:57:37 +0200 | justsomeguy | (~justsomeg@user/justsomeguy) (Ping timeout: 272 seconds) |
2024-05-01 19:54:54 +0200 | <geekosaur> | k`` ^^ |
2024-05-01 19:54:10 +0200 | <geekosaur> | so yeh, it comes down to the ISA |
2024-05-01 19:53:08 +0200 | Axma89310 | (~Axman6@user/axman6) |
2024-05-01 19:53:03 +0200 | <geekosaur> | "Also, Intel's manual[1] states that the results are undefined when cnt is greater than the operand size, but at least for 32- and 64-bit data sizes it has been observed that shift operations are performed by (cnt mod n), with n being the data size." |