2024/04/30

Newest at the top

2024-04-30 19:35:52 +0200todi(~todi@p57803331.dip0.t-ipconnect.de)
2024-04-30 19:32:25 +0200demon-cat(~demon-cat@dund-15-b2-v4wan-169642-cust1347.vm6.cable.virginm.net) (Ping timeout: 245 seconds)
2024-04-30 19:31:14 +0200pavonia(~user@user/siracusa) (Quit: Bye!)
2024-04-30 19:28:05 +0200tri(~tri@ool-18bbef1a.static.optonline.net) (Ping timeout: 240 seconds)
2024-04-30 19:24:35 +0200danza(~francesco@151.43.202.238) (Ping timeout: 264 seconds)
2024-04-30 19:23:58 +0200tri(~tri@ool-18bbef1a.static.optonline.net)
2024-04-30 19:20:35 +0200 <yin> or maybe i'm misunderstanding
2024-04-30 19:15:26 +0200 <yin> multiline signatures i'm guessing
2024-04-30 19:15:13 +0200 <yin> ah i see
2024-04-30 19:10:21 +0200yin(~yin@user/zero)
2024-04-30 19:08:49 +0200yin(~yin@user/zero) (Ping timeout: 256 seconds)
2024-04-30 19:02:50 +0200euleritian(~euleritia@ip4d16fc38.dynamic.kabel-deutschland.de)
2024-04-30 19:02:42 +0200euleritian(~euleritia@77.22.252.56) (Read error: Connection reset by peer)
2024-04-30 19:02:42 +0200ft(~ft@p3e9bc1bf.dip0.t-ipconnect.de)
2024-04-30 19:00:08 +0200tromp(~textual@92-110-219-57.cable.dynamic.v4.ziggo.nl)
2024-04-30 18:57:52 +0200rosco(~rosco@yp-146-6.tm.net.my) (Quit: Lost terminal)
2024-04-30 18:57:35 +0200tromp(~textual@92-110-219-57.cable.dynamic.v4.ziggo.nl) (Quit: My iMac has gone to sleep. ZZZzzz…)
2024-04-30 18:57:24 +0200Square(~Square@user/square)
2024-04-30 18:51:40 +0200euleritian(~euleritia@77.22.252.56)
2024-04-30 18:51:33 +0200raehik(~raehik@rdng-25-b2-v4wan-169990-cust1344.vm39.cable.virginm.net) (Ping timeout: 272 seconds)
2024-04-30 18:50:41 +0200 <dminuoso> Or `t -> t` even, stuff of that shape
2024-04-30 18:50:19 +0200euleritian(~euleritia@77.22.252.56) (Read error: Connection reset by peer)
2024-04-30 18:50:19 +0200 <dminuoso> Though its conceivable that bindings of type `(t -> t) -> t -> t` (without an explicit type signature) could fall into this trap as well
2024-04-30 18:47:01 +0200 <dminuoso> Okay this is a bit more elaborate, but basically I had a polyvariadic typeclass trick going on, and indending the subsequent top level type signature placed it as an argument into the last (nested) where binding
2024-04-30 18:43:05 +0200 <dminuoso> Oh yeah let me try and derive a motivating example that I can share
2024-04-30 18:42:05 +0200mima(~mmh@dhcp-138-246-3-42.dynamic.eduroam.mwn.de) (Ping timeout: 240 seconds)
2024-04-30 18:40:40 +0200 <yin> i am not a fan of the layout rules but i can't picture such a case
2024-04-30 18:36:37 +0200dsrt^(~cd@c-98-242-74-66.hsd1.ga.comcast.net) (Remote host closed the connection)
2024-04-30 18:36:34 +0200 <danza> but what you mean by "it altered the code"?
2024-04-30 18:36:28 +0200 <yin> dminuoso: how?
2024-04-30 18:36:02 +0200 <danza> sounds like consistent design...
2024-04-30 18:35:32 +0200 <dminuoso> What a strange experience.
2024-04-30 18:35:12 +0200 <dminuoso> Not just that, but in my specific code example, it altered the code, and type checked too.
2024-04-30 18:34:49 +0200 <dminuoso> Haskell - where indenting a type signature lifts.. it well to the value level.
2024-04-30 18:33:44 +0200machinedgod(~machinedg@d173-183-246-216.abhsia.telus.net) (Ping timeout: 256 seconds)
2024-04-30 18:31:56 +0200chele(~chele@user/chele) (Remote host closed the connection)
2024-04-30 18:29:35 +0200destituion(~destituio@85.221.111.174)
2024-04-30 18:29:20 +0200demon-cat(~demon-cat@dund-15-b2-v4wan-169642-cust1347.vm6.cable.virginm.net)
2024-04-30 18:29:18 +0200destituion(~destituio@2a02:2121:340:2456:fffe:d0f:7737:dd1) (Read error: Connection reset by peer)
2024-04-30 18:28:01 +0200madeleine-sydney(~madeleine@c-76-155-235-153.hsd1.co.comcast.net)
2024-04-30 18:22:02 +0200motherfsck(~motherfsc@user/motherfsck)
2024-04-30 18:21:46 +0200 <yin> TIL about autophobia
2024-04-30 18:21:24 +0200mima(~mmh@dhcp-138-246-3-42.dynamic.eduroam.mwn.de)
2024-04-30 18:20:04 +0200motherfsck(~motherfsc@user/motherfsck) (Quit: quit)
2024-04-30 18:19:26 +0200tzh(~tzh@c-73-164-206-160.hsd1.or.comcast.net)
2024-04-30 18:18:07 +0200peterbecich(~Thunderbi@47.229.123.186)
2024-04-30 18:15:06 +0200 <danza> :D
2024-04-30 18:14:41 +0200 <lambdabot> that I'll be in a permanent state of autophobia.
2024-04-30 18:14:41 +0200 <lambdabot> Baughn says: From my point of view, anyone who understands everything ghc can do is /scary/. I'm sure that will change once I reach that level myself, but then again, there's also the possibility
2024-04-30 18:14:40 +0200 <danza> @quote again