Newest at the top
| 2026-02-04 15:30:22 +0100 | Enrico63 | (~Enrico63@148.252.128.12) Enrico63 |
| 2026-02-04 15:08:33 +0100 | tremon | (~tremon@83.80.159.219) tremon |
| 2026-02-04 15:06:43 +0100 | Enrico63 | (~Enrico63@148.252.128.12) (Ping timeout: 272 seconds) |
| 2026-02-04 13:25:34 +0100 | ChubaDuba | (~ChubaDuba@37.112.231.64) (Read error: Connection reset by peer) |
| 2026-02-04 13:21:36 +0100 | ChubaDuba | (~ChubaDuba@37.112.231.64) ChubaDuba |
| 2026-02-04 13:19:02 +0100 | gwentpl | (~gwpl@user/gwentpl) gwentpl |
| 2026-02-04 11:50:31 +0100 | gwentpl | (~gwpl@user/gwentpl) (Ping timeout: 240 seconds) |
| 2026-02-04 08:57:47 +0100 | Enrico63 | (~Enrico63@148.252.128.12) Enrico63 |
| 2026-02-04 08:43:03 +0100 | redgloboli | (~redglobol@user/redgloboli) redgloboli |
| 2026-02-04 08:41:16 +0100 | redgloboli | (~redglobol@user/redgloboli) (Quit: ...enter the matrix...) |
| 2026-02-04 08:14:10 +0100 | ft | (~ft@p508db4c0.dip0.t-ipconnect.de) (Quit: leaving) |
| 2026-02-04 07:28:37 +0100 | ChubaDuba | (~ChubaDuba@37.112.231.64) (Read error: Connection reset by peer) |
| 2026-02-04 04:19:29 +0100 | mkoskar | (mkoskar@user/mkoskar) mkoskar |
| 2026-02-04 04:11:31 +0100 | mkoskar | (reeeee@user/mkoskar) (Ping timeout: 246 seconds) |
| 2026-02-04 02:29:13 +0100 | Digitteknohippie | Digit |
| 2026-02-04 02:21:31 +0100 | mvk | (~mvk@2607:fea8:5c9d:ee00::5716) (Client Quit) |
| 2026-02-04 02:21:28 +0100 | mvk | (~mvk@2607:fea8:5c9d:ee00::5716) mvk |
| 2026-02-04 01:59:29 +0100 | Digit | (~user@user/digit) (Ping timeout: 260 seconds) |
| 2026-02-04 01:59:02 +0100 | Digitteknohippie | (~user@user/digit) Digit |
| 2026-02-03 23:32:59 +0100 | Digitteknohippie | Digit |
| 2026-02-03 23:11:29 +0100 | Digit | (~user@user/digit) (Ping timeout: 260 seconds) |
| 2026-02-03 23:11:17 +0100 | Digitteknohippie | (~user@user/digit) Digit |
| 2026-02-03 21:10:23 +0100 | Digitteknohippie | Digit |
| 2026-02-03 20:12:55 +0100 | Digit | (~user@user/digit) (Ping timeout: 240 seconds) |
| 2026-02-03 20:11:35 +0100 | Digitteknohippie | (~user@user/digit) Digit |
| 2026-02-03 19:50:15 +0100 | Enrico63 | (~Enrico63@148.252.128.12) (Quit: Client closed) |
| 2026-02-03 19:16:33 +0100 | Enrico63 | (~Enrico63@148.252.128.12) Enrico63 |
| 2026-02-03 19:00:16 +0100 | ft | (~ft@p508db4c0.dip0.t-ipconnect.de) ft |
| 2026-02-03 18:51:41 +0100 | Enrico63 | (~Enrico63@148.252.128.12) (Quit: Client closed) |
| 2026-02-03 17:03:24 +0100 | T_X | (~T_X@diktynna.open-mesh.org) T_X |
| 2026-02-03 17:02:45 +0100 | T_X | (~T_X@diktynna.open-mesh.org) (Read error: Connection reset by peer) |
| 2026-02-03 16:47:16 +0100 | Digit | (~user@user/digit) Digit |
| 2026-02-03 16:43:31 +0100 | Digitteknohippie | (~user@user/digit) (Quit: ERC 5.6.0.30.1 (IRC client for GNU Emacs 30.2)) |
| 2026-02-03 16:43:20 +0100 | Digit | (~user@user/digit) (Remote host closed the connection) |
| 2026-02-03 16:28:16 +0100 | <geekosaur> | yeh, not sure what happened with that |
| 2026-02-03 16:27:17 +0100 | Digitteknohippie | (~user@user/digit) Digit |
| 2026-02-03 16:26:32 +0100 | Digit | (~user@user/digit) Digit |
| 2026-02-03 16:20:25 +0100 | Digit | (~user@user/digit) (Ping timeout: 264 seconds) |
| 2026-02-03 15:38:28 +0100 | Enrico63 | (~Enrico63@148.252.128.12) Enrico63 |
| 2026-02-03 13:59:38 +0100 | Enrico63 | (~Enrico63@148.252.128.12) (Quit: Client closed) |
| 2026-02-03 12:32:15 +0100 | redgloboli | (~redglobol@user/redgloboli) redgloboli |
| 2026-02-03 12:30:31 +0100 | redgloboli | (~redglobol@user/redgloboli) (Quit: ...enter the matrix...) |
| 2026-02-03 11:56:11 +0100 | Enrico63 | (~Enrico63@148.252.128.12) Enrico63 |
| 2026-02-03 11:46:40 +0100 | Enrico63 | (~Enrico63@148.252.128.12) (Quit: Client closed) |
| 2026-02-03 11:38:43 +0100 | <liskin> | I think there's also an issue in our tracker where someone's trying to introduce a PureLayout class or something so they can run the layout algorithms as a plugin for some existing Wayland compositor. That's something I'd love to learn more about maybe :-) |
| 2026-02-03 11:20:26 +0100 | ChubaDuba | (~ChubaDuba@37.112.231.64) ChubaDuba |
| 2026-02-03 11:19:27 +0100 | ChubaDuba | (~ChubaDuba@37.112.231.64) (Quit: WeeChat 4.8.1) |
| 2026-02-03 11:17:37 +0100 | <liskin> | (Note the subtle difference between "protocol" and "channel") |
| 2026-02-03 11:16:20 +0100 | <liskin> | Speaking of that channel - I considered Wayland protocol because I suspected we might need to send some Wayland data structures from the compositor to the WM, and it might just be easier to do over the same protocol. Unless implementing it on the Haskell side is a major pain in the ass. |
| 2026-02-03 11:14:58 +0100 | <liskin> | Sure, doing it the same way as X11 would be insecure. Having a privileged wm communicating over a secure channel is fine. |