Newest at the top
| 2024-06-23 02:49:48 +0200 | wlhn_ | (~wlhn@dl46fx8bgm9q8wl8cy4qy-3.rev.dnainternet.fi) (Quit: Leaving) |
| 2024-06-23 02:06:28 +0200 | zawaken | (~zawaken@user/zawaken) (Ping timeout: 268 seconds) |
| 2024-06-23 02:05:07 +0200 | zawaken- | (~zawaken@user/zawaken) |
| 2024-06-23 01:38:29 +0200 | wlhn | (~wlhn@dl46fx8hbfttwvhb-h1ly-3.rev.dnainternet.fi) (Ping timeout: 240 seconds) |
| 2024-06-23 01:35:15 +0200 | wlhn_ | (~wlhn@dl46fx8bgm9q8wl8cy4qy-3.rev.dnainternet.fi) |
| 2024-06-23 01:23:41 +0200 | tremon | (~tremon@83.80.159.219) (Quit: getting boxed in) |
| 2024-06-23 00:23:05 +0200 | wlhn | (~wlhn@dl46fx8hbfttwvhb-h1ly-3.rev.dnainternet.fi) |
| 2024-06-22 23:46:59 +0200 | dysthesis | (~dysthesis@user/dysthesis) (Quit: dysthesis) |
| 2024-06-22 23:35:03 +0200 | dysthesis | (~dysthesis@user/dysthesis) |
| 2024-06-22 23:33:57 +0200 | <geekosaur> | (I wouldn't bother importing it if that's all you're going to use from it, though) |
| 2024-06-22 23:33:30 +0200 | <geekosaur> | yes, liftIO works and XMonad.Prelude has a convenience alias `io` |
| 2024-06-22 23:30:28 +0200 | <haskellbridge> | <iqubic (she/her)> It's an instance of MonadIO, so I should be able to do it. |
| 2024-06-22 23:29:52 +0200 | <haskellbridge> | <iqubic (she/her)> Specifically the thing I want to is create a custom logHook that emits DBus stuff for me using my own custom logger. |
| 2024-06-22 23:28:57 +0200 | <haskellbridge> | <iqubic (she/her)> Right. Makes sense. Can I run arbitrary IO actions in X? |
| 2024-06-22 23:14:02 +0200 | <geekosaur> | toX produces an X action without applying it, defile applies it |
| 2024-06-22 23:13:33 +0200 | <geekosaur> | basically you can queue up changes in a PureX and apply them later with toX or defile |
| 2024-06-22 23:12:50 +0200 | <haskellbridge> | <iqubic (she/her)> I see. |
| 2024-06-22 23:12:09 +0200 | <geekosaur> | avoiding changes when they're unsafe (most notably, in a logHook where it could cause an infinite refresh loop) |
| 2024-06-22 23:10:41 +0200 | <haskellbridge> | <iqubic (she/her)> What is PureX used for? |
| 2024-06-22 23:09:51 +0200 | <geekosaur> | the instances of XLike are X and PureX |
| 2024-06-22 23:09:19 +0200 | <geekosaur> | the ideas is you can write pure actions and later apply them to X |
| 2024-06-22 23:08:54 +0200 | <geekosaur> | https://hackage.haskell.org/package/xmonad-contrib-0.18.0/docs/XMonad-Util-PureX.html#g:1 |
| 2024-06-22 23:06:21 +0200 | <haskellbridge> | <iqubic (she/her)> Why does X.Util.ExtensibleState use XLike, and is the titular X Monad an instance of XLike? |
| 2024-06-22 22:14:33 +0200 | catman | (~catman@user/catman) |
| 2024-06-22 22:11:47 +0200 | catman | (~catman@user/catman) (Ping timeout: 256 seconds) |
| 2024-06-22 21:35:38 +0200 | tremon | (~tremon@83.80.159.219) |
| 2024-06-22 21:15:19 +0200 | wlhn | (~wlhn@dl46fx8hbfttwvhb-h1ly-3.rev.dnainternet.fi) (Quit: Leaving) |
| 2024-06-22 20:23:18 +0200 | Enrico63 | (~Enrico63@81.109.143.226) (Quit: Client closed) |
| 2024-06-22 17:58:32 +0200 | Enrico63 | (~Enrico63@81.109.143.226) |
| 2024-06-22 14:47:31 +0200 | down200 | (~down200@shell.lug.mtu.edu) |
| 2024-06-22 14:45:10 +0200 | down200 | (~down200@shell.lug.mtu.edu) (Ping timeout: 256 seconds) |
| 2024-06-22 14:35:30 +0200 | down200 | (~down200@shell.lug.mtu.edu) |
| 2024-06-22 14:33:21 +0200 | down200 | (~down200@shell.lug.mtu.edu) (Ping timeout: 256 seconds) |
| 2024-06-22 14:05:48 +0200 | down200 | (~down200@shell.lug.mtu.edu) |
| 2024-06-22 14:01:53 +0200 | down200 | (~down200@shell.lug.mtu.edu) (Ping timeout: 268 seconds) |
| 2024-06-22 13:37:20 +0200 | down200 | (~down200@shell.lug.mtu.edu) |
| 2024-06-22 13:34:45 +0200 | down200 | (~down200@shell.lug.mtu.edu) (Ping timeout: 268 seconds) |
| 2024-06-22 11:29:56 +0200 | <haskellbridge> | <iqubic (she/her)> Makes sense. I'll think about this more myself. |
| 2024-06-22 11:28:55 +0200 | <liskin> | (train about to reach its destination, afk soon) |
| 2024-06-22 11:27:57 +0200 | <liskin> | otherwise you'd lose your layouts on reload |
| 2024-06-22 11:27:50 +0200 | <liskin> | WindowSet isn't stored using ExtensibleState, but it is preserved across restarts |
| 2024-06-22 11:27:13 +0200 | <haskellbridge> | <iqubic (she/her)> Is the WindowSet part of the state, and it is Persistant? |
| 2024-06-22 11:26:45 +0200 | <liskin> | EwmhDesktops possibly as well |
| 2024-06-22 11:26:36 +0200 | <liskin> | the one that doesn't is useful for caching stuff (e.g. ManageDocks uses it) |
| 2024-06-22 11:25:57 +0200 | <liskin> | iqubic: one survives restart and the other doesn't |
| 2024-06-22 11:18:28 +0200 | <haskellbridge> | <iqubic (she/her)> What's the difference between "StateExtension" and "PersistentExtension"? |
| 2024-06-22 10:37:46 +0200 | <Leary> | iqubic: https://hackage.haskell.org/package/xmonad-contrib-0.18.0/docs/XMonad-Util-ExtensibleState.html |
| 2024-06-22 10:11:26 +0200 | <haskellbridge> | <iqubic (she/her)> Is there a guide to using ExtensibleState stuff? |
| 2024-06-22 10:03:18 +0200 | <haskellbridge> | <iqubic (she/her)> I see. That makes sense actually... |
| 2024-06-22 10:02:23 +0200 | <Leary> | `logHook` runs every refresh; it's not layoutDescriptionChangedHook, so you need to be the one to decide whether or not it's changed. If you really wanted that hook you'd need to put a modifier over the Choose layout to watch for relevant messages, which is another approach. |