2025/08/15

Newest at the top

2025-08-15 05:44:16 +0200 <geekosaur> yeh, I just saw that
2025-08-15 05:44:08 +0200 <haskellbridge> <iqubic (she/her)> Hovering my mouse over "trace" there shows me "MonadIO m => m ()" as the signature.
2025-08-15 05:43:28 +0200 <haskellbridge> <iqubic (she/her)> https://xmonad.github.io/xmonad-docs/xmonad-contrib/src/XMonad.Hooks.ManageDebug.html#debugManageH…
2025-08-15 05:42:50 +0200 <geekosaur> that should be it, maybe we do have a different trace in scope
2025-08-15 05:41:53 +0200 <haskellbridge> <iqubic (she/her)> But I found this: https://xmonad.github.io/xmonad-docs/xmonad-contrib/
2025-08-15 05:41:48 +0200 <haskellbridge> <iqubic (she/her)> Not sure if this is the live docs, or just a different domain showing the same haddocks.
2025-08-15 05:40:25 +0200 <geekosaur> not currently
2025-08-15 05:38:37 +0200 <haskellbridge> <iqubic (she/her)> Is there a new release planned?
2025-08-15 05:38:25 +0200 <geekosaur> I can never remember where they live
2025-08-15 05:38:16 +0200 <geekosaur> I think if you use (and can find) the live docs it's been fixed and will go live with the next release
2025-08-15 05:37:37 +0200 <geekosaur> but haddock insists on linking to everything it exports
2025-08-15 05:37:21 +0200 <geekosaur> that's a bug in how we have things set up. X.C.Prime is an ancient experiment that went nowhere
2025-08-15 05:36:04 +0200 <haskellbridge> <iqubic (she/her)> I think that's not the same "trace" as DebugManage uses.
2025-08-15 05:35:49 +0200 <haskellbridge> <iqubic (she/her)> I was viewing the source code on the Hackage site and the mouse hover info was showing me the signature for this "trace" https://hackage.haskell.org/package/xmonad-contrib-0.18.1/docs/XMonad-Config-Prime.html#v:trace
2025-08-15 05:32:49 +0200 <haskellbridge> <iqubic (she/her)> Oh.. So that's not actually "real" I/O. Got it. I see now why opening a window for debug output would be hard.
2025-08-15 05:32:16 +0200 <geekosaur> which is why it has to use debugBelch: you run into problems with locked Handles otherwise
2025-08-15 05:31:58 +0200 <geekosaur> trace uses unsafePerformIO
2025-08-15 05:30:45 +0200 <haskellbridge> <iqubic (she/her)> Or is that a different because "trace" is "MonadIO" action and not an "X Monad" action?
2025-08-15 05:30:31 +0200 <dpn> *grabs popcorn*
2025-08-15 05:30:03 +0200 <haskellbridge> <iqubic (she/her)> geekosaur: Isn't calling "trace" technically doing I/O?
2025-08-15 05:29:08 +0200 <dpn> being able to summon a window for the log would be pretty amazing
2025-08-15 05:23:33 +0200 <geekosaur> I've been thinking about how to capture output to a window without having to plumb I/O through the pure parts of a manageHook
2025-08-15 05:23:12 +0200 <haskellbridge> <iqubic (she/her)> Ah. I se.
2025-08-15 05:22:52 +0200 <geekosaur> you look at wherever stderr (not stdout; it actually uses the RTS's debugBelch internally iirc) is going.
2025-08-15 05:21:03 +0200 <haskellbridge> <iqubic (she/her)> Looking at the code, I see you're just using "trace". But won't that write so stdout? How would I view those messages while xmonad is running?
2025-08-15 05:19:49 +0200 <dpn> i basically only use irc to come here now - might be more convenient to use matrix. cheers
2025-08-15 05:19:29 +0200 <geekosaur> if you /whois haskellbridge you'll get a list (well, a URL containing a list)
2025-08-15 05:19:05 +0200 <geekosaur> yes, haskellbridge bridges a number of Haskell IRC channels to matrix.org rooms
2025-08-15 05:19:04 +0200 <haskellbridge> <iqubic (she/her)> When I use things like debugManageNextWindow, where do the messages get put? Does XMonad have a log file?
2025-08-15 05:18:54 +0200 <dpn> ahh cool - I really want to use matrix more... usually an up hill battle trying to convince other people to
2025-08-15 05:18:21 +0200 <haskellbridge> <iqubic (she/her)> I'm using matrix via Element's Web client.
2025-08-15 05:17:50 +0200 <geekosaur> it's not a problem, and both hlint and I think ghc (with -Wall) will warn you
2025-08-15 05:17:40 +0200 <dpn> sorry using catgirl and didn't realise the brige messages were a portal - where's the other end?
2025-08-15 05:15:55 +0200 <haskellbridge> <iqubic (she/her)> I'm not sure that's a problem, but it is something with an easy fix.
2025-08-15 05:15:40 +0200 <haskellbridge> <iqubic (she/her)> dpn: You are importing CopyWindows twice.
2025-08-15 05:15:26 +0200 <haskellbridge> <iqubic (she/her)> Oh, I didn't know about that.
2025-08-15 05:15:23 +0200 <geekosaur> which is the main reason I wrote ManageDebug
2025-08-15 05:15:11 +0200 <geekosaur> or you could use debugManageHookOn and press the key sequence you selected before popping it out
2025-08-15 05:12:52 +0200 <haskellbridge> <iqubic (she/her)> I can do that on my own. I have the skills.
2025-08-15 05:12:43 +0200 <haskellbridge> <iqubic (she/her)> One thing I still need to do is figure out if it's possible to create a manageHook for Firefox's Picture-In-Picture popout. I want that to float and be in the lower corner and a few other things. I guess the way to handle that would be to xprop the window and check for a property that's different from the main firefox window's properties to isolate that window.
2025-08-15 05:10:22 +0200 <haskellbridge> <iqubic (she/her)> That's neat!
2025-08-15 05:10:08 +0200 <geekosaur> or to specific workspaces (copyWindow copies to a specific workspace, copyToAll copies to all workspaces)
2025-08-15 05:09:25 +0200 <geekosaur> no, it'll only place it at the last place it's told to. but it makes a window "sticky" in the sense that it will be displayed on all workspaces
2025-08-15 05:09:02 +0200 <dpn> and now it's working... i swear it was capitalised when i started trying to figure this out earlier... either way, this explains weirdness with manageHook i've had in the past haha. Thanks heaps for the help!
2025-08-15 05:08:26 +0200 <haskellbridge> <iqubic (she/her)> What does XMonad.Action.CopyWindow do? Surely you can't tell XOrg to draw the same window in multiple places on the screen.
2025-08-15 05:07:57 +0200 <dpn> ahh... another TIL thanks!
2025-08-15 05:07:46 +0200 <dpn> i noticed I'm not explicitly starting notifyd myself in my xmonad session rc or my config... I dont think startup order would impact this though
2025-08-15 05:07:27 +0200 <geekosaur> right, the property contains appName and className in that order
2025-08-15 05:07:00 +0200 <dpn> TIL about managedebug, thanks
2025-08-15 05:06:50 +0200 <dpn> ah - xprop had both listed... it doesn't work with either