2023/01/02

2023-01-02 00:00:16 +0100defjam(~defjam@2a02:c7e:2807:b900:f093:37cf:2efc:6f2b)
2023-01-02 01:10:16 +0100defjam(~defjam@2a02:c7e:2807:b900:f093:37cf:2efc:6f2b) (Quit: WeeChat 3.7.1)
2023-01-02 03:39:19 +0100tremon(~tremon@83-85-213-108.cable.dynamic.v4.ziggo.nl) (Quit: getting boxed in)
2023-01-02 04:03:59 +0100banc(banc@gateway/vpn/protonvpn/banc) (Ping timeout: 260 seconds)
2023-01-02 04:15:40 +0100td_(~td@83.135.9.35) (Ping timeout: 260 seconds)
2023-01-02 04:17:08 +0100td_(~td@83.135.9.63)
2023-01-02 04:24:04 +0100banc(banc@gateway/vpn/protonvpn/banc)
2023-01-02 05:06:57 +0100werneta(~werneta@70-142-214-115.lightspeed.irvnca.sbcglobal.net) (Quit: Lost terminal)
2023-01-02 05:15:07 +0100werneta(~werneta@70-142-214-115.lightspeed.irvnca.sbcglobal.net)
2023-01-02 05:19:22 +0100defjam(~defjam@2a02:c7e:2807:b900:2821:cf47:1533:6089)
2023-01-02 05:44:47 +0100de-vri-es(~de-vri-es@voyager.de-vri.es) (Ping timeout: 260 seconds)
2023-01-02 05:56:10 +0100Janoo(~username@c-bc15225c.010-598-73746f7.bbcust.telenor.se)
2023-01-02 05:57:23 +0100 <Janoo> I am trying to remap the M-{w,e,r} keybindings to M-{u,i,o}. I found this line online which supposedly should take care of that
2023-01-02 05:57:27 +0100 <Janoo> ((m .|. modm, key), screenWorkspace sc >>= flip whenJust (windows . f)) | (key, sc) <- zip [xK_u, xK_i, xK_o] [0..] , (f, m) <- [(W.view, 0), (W.shift, shiftMask)]
2023-01-02 05:57:44 +0100 <Janoo> I added it to my additionalKeys
2023-01-02 05:58:03 +0100 <Janoo> but I get an error when I recompile
2023-01-02 05:59:17 +0100 <Janoo> the error is: error: parse error on input ‘|’
2023-01-02 05:59:50 +0100 <Janoo> it refers to the | that is before (key,sc)
2023-01-02 06:00:58 +0100 <Janoo> Any suggestions on how to solve this?
2023-01-02 06:03:26 +0100de-vri-es(~de-vri-es@voyager.de-vri.es)
2023-01-02 06:23:18 +0100 <HB[m]> ... (full message at <https://libera.ems.host/_matrix/media/v3/download/libera.chat/f0495deb2282f44fa57dc62244b0628f78eb…>)
2023-01-02 06:23:25 +0100 <HB[m]> * ```haskell... (full message at <https://libera.ems.host/_matrix/media/v3/download/libera.chat/39fcd62399b6d3646b775a537487446a5404…>)
2023-01-02 06:24:23 +0100 <HB[m]> `additionalKeys`... (full message at <https://libera.ems.host/_matrix/media/v3/download/libera.chat/38b026b48fac1ad83b3d9b2e9c28910d7f8e…>)
2023-01-02 06:24:34 +0100 <HB[m]> * ```haskell... (full message at <https://libera.ems.host/_matrix/media/v3/download/libera.chat/694971ea631b8b3ee1f05ed882889b8194f2…>)
2023-01-02 06:25:31 +0100 <HB[m]> * ```haskell... (full message at <https://libera.ems.host/_matrix/media/v3/download/libera.chat/23279897d9855acc54bef5e5488d581449d5…>)
2023-01-02 06:25:46 +0100 <HB[m]> * ```haskell... (full message at <https://libera.ems.host/_matrix/media/v3/download/libera.chat/9c4a645870362658749b5121896b6ad60145…>)
2023-01-02 06:28:44 +0100 <HB[m]> * ```haskell... (full message at <https://libera.ems.host/_matrix/media/v3/download/libera.chat/803c664819f31165a75cb4bef5184e1730f3…>)
2023-01-02 06:29:48 +0100 <HB[m]> * ```haskell... (full message at <https://libera.ems.host/_matrix/media/v3/download/libera.chat/0395444a9c252a48549767f006d2f04f3545…>)
2023-01-02 06:31:59 +0100 <HB[m]> `[xK_F1..xK_F2]` means F1 through to ... F2.
2023-01-02 06:31:59 +0100 <HB[m]> You can specify `[xK_u, xK_i, xK_o]` instead and make it 3 keys only which will handle 0...2 IIRC
2023-01-02 06:49:13 +0100 <HB[m]> * ```haskell... (full message at <https://libera.ems.host/_matrix/media/v3/download/libera.chat/9bca27b4d333838c77af3a295590afa653d5…>)
2023-01-02 06:54:09 +0100 <Janoo> I added the block you suggested, commented out all the previous addiotionalKeys I had; and I am getting the following error HB[m]
2023-01-02 06:54:24 +0100 <Janoo> Not in scope: ‘W.shift’
2023-01-02 06:54:25 +0100 <Janoo> No module named ‘W’ is imported.
2023-01-02 06:54:52 +0100 <HB[m]> `import qualified XMonad.StackSet as W`
2023-01-02 06:54:52 +0100 <HB[m]> put this on top of file
2023-01-02 06:56:38 +0100 <Janoo> • Couldn't match type ‘XConfig l0 -> KeyMask’
2023-01-02 06:56:38 +0100 <Janoo> with ‘Foreign.C.Types.CUInt’
2023-01-02 06:56:38 +0100 <Janoo> Expected: KeyMask
2023-01-02 06:56:38 +0100 <Janoo> Actual: XConfig l0 -> KeyMask
2023-01-02 06:56:38 +0100 <Janoo> • Probable cause: ‘modMask’ is applied to too few arguments
2023-01-02 06:56:41 +0100 <Janoo> In the second argument of ‘(.|.)’, namely ‘modMask’
2023-01-02 06:56:43 +0100 <Janoo> In the expression: m .|. modMask
2023-01-02 06:56:46 +0100 <Janoo> In the expression: (m .|. modMask, key)
2023-01-02 06:56:58 +0100 <Janoo> that's the error that I am getting now HB[m]
2023-01-02 06:58:08 +0100 <HB[m]> https://bpa.st/ use this website, and paste your entire xmonad.config here and then wait for soemone to look it over
2023-01-02 06:58:52 +0100 <Janoo> will do later, thx for all the help HB[m]!
2023-01-02 07:01:47 +0100 <HB[m]> Don't forget to share the link with us.
2023-01-02 07:07:47 +0100jabuxas(~jabuxas@user/jabuxas) (Ping timeout: 246 seconds)
2023-01-02 07:10:03 +0100jabuxas(~jabuxas@user/jabuxas)
2023-01-02 07:15:53 +0100 <Janoo> HB[m]: here is a link to my current config: https://bpa.st/XX52A
2023-01-02 07:46:32 +0100 <Janoo> In case someone else drops by here, here is my issue: I am trying to remap M-{w,e,r} to M-{u,i,o}. I have pasted the blocks of code provided by HB[m] above but I have had compilation errors. My config file can be found here: https://bpa.st/XX52A . I would be grateful if anyone could tell me how to change the code to remap the aforementioned keys. Thank you!
2023-01-02 07:56:50 +0100 <Solid> Janoo: try something like http://ix.io/4k9r/haskell
2023-01-02 07:56:57 +0100 <Solid> (and now adjust the keys as needed)
2023-01-02 07:57:49 +0100 <Solid> (btw, if you're new to XMonad definitely check out the tutorial: https://xmonad.org/TUTORIAL.html :)
2023-01-02 07:59:24 +0100 <Janoo> Solid: I have been using for a pretty long time, but never got around to learning haskell and just found bits of code that did what I needed from other configurations. I should really get into it, sorry for bothering you guys and thank you for all the help!
2023-01-02 08:02:03 +0100 <Janoo> Solid: works perfectly now! thank you for the help!
2023-01-02 08:02:53 +0100 <Solid> No worries, just figured I'd throw it out there :)
2023-01-02 08:03:26 +0100 <Solid> Especially since, once you update XMonad, things like `defaultConfig` will go away and you'll have to switch to `def`
2023-01-02 08:04:14 +0100 <Solid> (I've sheepishly already changed this in the config I sent you)
2023-01-02 08:04:55 +0100defjam(~defjam@2a02:c7e:2807:b900:2821:cf47:1533:6089) (Ping timeout: 260 seconds)
2023-01-02 08:05:36 +0100 <Janoo> Solid: Yeah I noticed that a couple of days back when I switched from my old repo version to the newest one to add some more layouts. Got a bunch of warnings about deprecations...
2023-01-02 08:06:43 +0100 <Janoo> Solid: I have been dragging this config for many years now, thank you for the switch to def as well!
2023-01-02 08:07:33 +0100 <Solid> Most deprecations are pretty easy to fix (and we usually tell you exactly what to do), but if you need help with anything feel free to ask here!
2023-01-02 08:07:49 +0100 <Janoo> Solid: will do!
2023-01-02 08:26:36 +0100werneta(~werneta@70-142-214-115.lightspeed.irvnca.sbcglobal.net) (Remote host closed the connection)
2023-01-02 08:34:08 +0100defjam(~defjam@90.201.240.60)
2023-01-02 08:37:27 +0100werneta(~werneta@70-142-214-115.lightspeed.irvnca.sbcglobal.net)
2023-01-02 08:38:56 +0100defjam(~defjam@90.201.240.60) (Ping timeout: 252 seconds)
2023-01-02 08:56:47 +0100Janoo(~username@c-bc15225c.010-598-73746f7.bbcust.telenor.se) ()
2023-01-02 09:07:24 +0100defjam(~defjam@90.201.240.60)
2023-01-02 09:12:02 +0100defjam(~defjam@90.201.240.60) (Ping timeout: 246 seconds)
2023-01-02 09:42:43 +0100defjam(~defjam@2a02:c7e:2807:b900:2821:cf47:1533:6089)
2023-01-02 09:47:35 +0100defjam(~defjam@2a02:c7e:2807:b900:2821:cf47:1533:6089) (Ping timeout: 260 seconds)
2023-01-02 10:16:28 +0100werneta(~werneta@70-142-214-115.lightspeed.irvnca.sbcglobal.net) (Ping timeout: 252 seconds)
2023-01-02 10:17:32 +0100defjam(~defjam@2a02:c7e:2807:b900:2821:cf47:1533:6089)
2023-01-02 10:18:19 +0100werneta(~werneta@70-142-214-115.lightspeed.irvnca.sbcglobal.net)
2023-01-02 10:22:52 +0100defjam(~defjam@2a02:c7e:2807:b900:2821:cf47:1533:6089) (Max SendQ exceeded)
2023-01-02 10:23:21 +0100defjam(~defjam@2a02:c7e:2807:b900:2821:cf47:1533:6089)
2023-01-02 12:32:35 +0100defjam(~defjam@2a02:c7e:2807:b900:2821:cf47:1533:6089) (Ping timeout: 252 seconds)
2023-01-02 12:43:47 +0100thyriaen(~thyriaen@2a01:aea0:dd4:4bae:6245:cbff:fe9f:48b1)
2023-01-02 12:45:28 +0100 <thyriaen> I wonder - is there a way to tell picom to treat the entire tabs-bar ( in tabbed layout ) as a single "window" such that only the edges on the far left and far right are rounded into corners by picom ? ( and not the internal ones between each new tab )
2023-01-02 12:59:45 +0100guydoodmanbro[m](~guydoodma@2001:470:69fc:105::2:74fe)
2023-01-02 13:02:17 +0100defjam(~defjam@2a02:c7e:2807:b900:2821:cf47:1533:6089)
2023-01-02 13:41:09 +0100toledo(~toledo@141.30.130.27)
2023-01-02 13:49:54 +0100toledo(~toledo@141.30.130.27) (Quit: Client closed)
2023-01-02 14:38:01 +0100jabuxas(~jabuxas@user/jabuxas) (Ping timeout: 265 seconds)
2023-01-02 14:41:14 +0100jabuxas(~jabuxas@user/jabuxas)
2023-01-02 15:07:36 +0100defjam(~defjam@2a02:c7e:2807:b900:2821:cf47:1533:6089) (Ping timeout: 252 seconds)
2023-01-02 15:09:59 +0100 <jifarra[m]> Is there an easy way to define a keybind that rotates through the options in a MultiToggle group, rather than having keybindings for each toggle?
2023-01-02 15:16:02 +0100 <geekosaur> not really; HLists are rarely easy
2023-01-02 15:16:51 +0100 <geekosaur> you'd have to expose the HList outside the definition, and track your positiion in it yourself
2023-01-02 15:25:10 +0100defjam(~defjam@90.201.240.60)
2023-01-02 15:36:28 +0100defjam(~defjam@90.201.240.60) (Ping timeout: 268 seconds)
2023-01-02 15:39:56 +0100defjam(~defjam@90.201.240.60)
2023-01-02 15:57:57 +0100 <thyriaen> geekosaur, do you know the answer to my question from 3 hours ago ?
2023-01-02 16:12:26 +0100tremon(~tremon@83-85-213-108.cable.dynamic.v4.ziggo.nl)
2023-01-02 16:13:25 +0100 <geekosaur> that would be a picom question and I have no idea
2023-01-02 16:14:00 +0100 <geekosaur> suspect there's no good way to do it; they really are separate windows as far as xmonad and X11 are concerned, so picom would have to know how to group them somehow
2023-01-02 16:17:56 +0100 <Jadesheit[m]> if the border window has specific tags you can target those
2023-01-02 16:18:04 +0100 <Jadesheit[m]> try with xprop
2023-01-02 16:18:18 +0100 <geekosaur> it doesn't have any
2023-01-02 16:18:41 +0100 <geekosaur> I messed with that code a couple years back, hacking it up locally to add opacity props 🙂
2023-01-02 16:19:51 +0100 <geekosaur> https://hackage.haskell.org/package/xmonad-contrib-0.17.1/docs/src/XMonad.Util.XUtils.html#createN… fwiw
2023-01-02 16:20:13 +0100 <thyriaen> what is that ?
2023-01-02 16:20:40 +0100 <geekosaur> the problem with making changes there is it's used by things other than tabs; the problem with making it in the tab code is it doesn't actually have the window, Decoration does, and Decoration can't tell the difference between a tab and a titlebar
2023-01-02 16:21:57 +0100 <geekosaur> (which was also what was wrong with my opacity hack; it only worked because I didn't use anything else that called `createNewWindow`)
2023-01-02 16:23:58 +0100 <geekosaur> "that" was the code that creates the Decoration windows used by tabs, titlebars, ShowWName, and a few other places
2023-01-02 16:38:51 +0100 <thyriaen> geekosaur, i don't quite get it but i don't use any decoration other than borders and tabs
2023-01-02 16:39:08 +0100 <thyriaen> would it work for me if i adjust it and can i then get kinda a grouped window for my tabs ?
2023-01-02 16:39:49 +0100 <geekosaur> you still need to convince picom to treat them as a single window, which is something we can't help with
2023-01-02 16:40:26 +0100 <geekosaur> but if you forked xmonad-contrib, yes, you could patch that code to add a property for picom to match on
2023-01-02 16:52:14 +0100defjam(~defjam@90.201.240.60) (Ping timeout: 246 seconds)
2023-01-02 17:00:06 +0100purity-gearD[m](~pipe-gear@2001:470:69fc:105::2:ac18) (Quit: You have been kicked for being idle)
2023-01-02 17:00:08 +0100liskin[m](~liskinmat@2001:470:69fc:105::768) (Quit: You have been kicked for being idle)
2023-01-02 17:22:54 +0100defjam(~defjam@90.201.240.60)
2023-01-02 17:28:19 +0100defjam(~defjam@90.201.240.60) (Ping timeout: 260 seconds)
2023-01-02 17:32:58 +0100 <thyriaen> geekosaur, do you know if there is a way for picom to treat the tabs as part of the window ? because if the tabs have shadow they draw it ontop of the window the tabs are attached to
2023-01-02 17:33:10 +0100liskin[m](~liskinmat@2001:470:69fc:105::768)
2023-01-02 17:34:32 +0100 <xmonadtrack> New xmonad-contrib branch created: tmp (1 commit) https://github.com/xmonad/xmonad-contrib/tree/tmp
2023-01-02 17:37:02 +0100 <geekosaur> No, I don't
2023-01-02 17:40:33 +0100 <liskin> geekosaur, Solid: what do we think about TupleSections? hlint 3.5 suggests those by default now for zip/repeat combos
2023-01-02 17:41:07 +0100 <liskin> hm, that's probably a question I might ask via a PR…
2023-01-02 17:42:08 +0100 <geekosaur> TupleSections has been around forever; that it's an extension is arguably a wart in the Haskell language standard
2023-01-02 17:47:54 +0100 <geekosaur> we have much more questionable stuff in the codebase imo
2023-01-02 17:56:55 +0100defjam(~defjam@90.201.240.60)
2023-01-02 18:01:43 +0100defjam(~defjam@90.201.240.60) (Ping timeout: 256 seconds)
2023-01-02 18:08:07 +0100 <Solid> liskin: fwiw, I find TupleSections very readable
2023-01-02 18:29:17 +0100 <dminuoso> Isnt there a proposal in the making of turning [a] into `List a`, (a, b) into `Tuple2 a b`, and so forth?
2023-01-02 18:29:37 +0100 <dminuoso> geekosaur surely knows
2023-01-02 18:30:17 +0100defjam(~defjam@90.201.240.60)
2023-01-02 18:36:02 +0100defjam(~defjam@90.201.240.60) (Ping timeout: 272 seconds)
2023-01-02 18:40:23 +0100 <Solid> Probably the no-puns one?
2023-01-02 18:41:35 +0100jao(~jao@cpc103048-sgyl39-2-0-cust502.18-2.cable.virginm.net)
2023-01-02 18:55:25 +0100 <dminuoso> Right. I think my beef with TupleSections is that tuples themselves are special syntax
2023-01-02 18:55:52 +0100 <dminuoso> One further thought is that GHC2021 enables TupleSections by default
2023-01-02 19:04:21 +0100defjam(~defjam@90.201.240.60)
2023-01-02 19:09:10 +0100defjam(~defjam@90.201.240.60) (Ping timeout: 265 seconds)
2023-01-02 19:37:13 +0100 <geekosaur> I have heard some discussion of the list one, but nothing about the tuple
2023-01-02 19:37:45 +0100 <geekosaur> wouldn't surprise me much especially given the Solo proposal passed
2023-01-02 19:38:38 +0100defjam(~defjam@90.201.240.60)
2023-01-02 19:41:44 +0100abhixec(~abhinav@c-67-169-139-16.hsd1.ca.comcast.net)
2023-01-02 19:43:45 +0100defjam(~defjam@90.201.240.60) (Ping timeout: 268 seconds)
2023-01-02 20:11:52 +0100defjam(~defjam@90.201.240.60)
2023-01-02 20:16:59 +0100defjam(~defjam@90.201.240.60) (Ping timeout: 260 seconds)
2023-01-02 20:31:37 +0100Stormfox2[m](~stormfox2@2001:470:69fc:105::2:eba0)
2023-01-02 20:31:56 +0100 <Stormfox2[m]> Hey, can somebody help me debugging my issue with tint2 and XMonad?
2023-01-02 20:32:07 +0100 <Stormfox2[m]> Docks just dont leave space for it ever
2023-01-02 20:32:13 +0100 <Stormfox2[m]> https://hastebin.com/eqoliyodat.swift
2023-01-02 20:32:19 +0100 <Stormfox2[m]> This is my config
2023-01-02 20:40:56 +0100defjam(~defjam@90.201.240.60)
2023-01-02 20:45:42 +0100defjam(~defjam@90.201.240.60) (Ping timeout: 255 seconds)
2023-01-02 20:46:42 +0100 <xmonadtrack> xmonad-contrib Tomas Janousek * v0.17.1-110-g6b20dbca: Apply hlint 3.5 hints (2 hours ago, 6 files, 17+ 10-) https://github.com/xmonad/xmonad-contrib/commit/6b20dbca42f2
2023-01-02 20:46:44 +0100 <xmonadtrack> xmonad-contrib Tomas Janousek * v0.17.1-111-ge2ffa533: ci: Unpin runner in hlint workflow; bump hlint to 3.5 (3 hours ago, 1 file, 2+ 2-) https://github.com/xmonad/xmonad-contrib/commit/e2ffa533da76
2023-01-02 20:49:37 +0100 <geekosaur> Stormfox2[m], you're missing `manageDocks` in your `manageHook` so it never recognizes the dock windows to reserve space for them
2023-01-02 20:50:06 +0100 <Stormfox2[m]> I dont
2023-01-02 20:50:11 +0100 <Stormfox2[m]> { manageHook = myManageHook <+> manageDocks
2023-01-02 20:50:15 +0100 <Stormfox2[m]> geekosaur:
2023-01-02 20:50:46 +0100 <geekosaur> hm, sorry, I specifically checked for that but didnt notice it at the very top…
2023-01-02 20:51:06 +0100 <Stormfox2[m]> All good, it was in the main on the bottom
2023-01-02 20:51:46 +0100 <Stormfox2[m]> I am getting really frustrated, tried everything and I dont want to use gaps, because I am having 3 monitors and only one bar
2023-01-02 20:51:53 +0100 <xmonadtrack> xmonad Tomas Janousek * v0.17.1-42-g63f73e1: ci: Unpin runner in hlint workflow; bump hlint to 3.5 (3 hours ago, 1 file, 2+ 2-) https://github.com/xmonad/xmonad/commit/63f73e18f94c
2023-01-02 20:53:41 +0100 <Stormfox2[m]> https://hastebin.com/iqeqoyivun.apache Is that fine?
2023-01-02 20:57:03 +0100 <geekosaur> looks fine, yes
2023-01-02 20:57:51 +0100 <geekosaur> hm, wait
2023-01-02 20:58:07 +0100 <geekosaur> no, it's wrong. no strut properties
2023-01-02 20:58:23 +0100 <geekosaur> which means xmonad won't know how much space to reserve for it or where to reserve it
2023-01-02 20:58:49 +0100 <geekosaur> _NET_WM_STRUT or _NET_WM_STRUT_PARTIAL is needed
2023-01-02 20:59:07 +0100 <geekosaur> you need to make sure tint2 is configured to set at least one of those
2023-01-02 21:01:31 +0100 <Stormfox2[m]> Hm, I am going to look for it, thank you
2023-01-02 21:02:57 +0100defjam(~defjam@90.201.240.60)
2023-01-02 21:03:54 +0100 <geekosaur> this may be somewhat tricky; for example, dzen2 will only set them if you place it exactly at the screen edge, miscalculate by one pixel in either direction and you get no struts
2023-01-02 21:04:53 +0100 <Stormfox2[m]> Wow
2023-01-02 21:07:44 +0100defjam(~defjam@90.201.240.60) (Ping timeout: 246 seconds)
2023-01-02 21:08:12 +0100 <Stormfox2[m]> That kind of worked
2023-01-02 21:08:15 +0100 <Stormfox2[m]> But in the wrong way
2023-01-02 21:09:52 +0100Stormfox2[m]uploaded an image: (359KiB) < https://libera.ems.host/_matrix/media/v3/download/matrix.org/whlMUHEWzMivAFiGScxsbjTm/image.png >
2023-01-02 21:09:56 +0100 <Stormfox2[m]> It does the gap on the right side
2023-01-02 21:14:49 +0100 <geekosaur> so it set the wrong strut. not sure I can help there
2023-01-02 21:14:57 +0100 <Stormfox2[m]> It works :D
2023-01-02 21:15:10 +0100 <Stormfox2[m]> I had to pivot it and not it works :D
2023-01-02 21:15:13 +0100 <Stormfox2[m]> Thank you a lot
2023-01-02 21:18:39 +0100 <geekosaur> was just about to ask about that and strut_policy, yes
2023-01-02 21:25:08 +0100jabuxas(~jabuxas@user/jabuxas) (Quit: WeeChat 2.8)
2023-01-02 21:28:34 +0100jabuxas(~jabuxas@user/jabuxas)
2023-01-02 21:38:35 +0100defjam(~defjam@90.201.240.60)
2023-01-02 21:43:23 +0100defjam(~defjam@90.201.240.60) (Ping timeout: 268 seconds)
2023-01-02 22:08:03 +0100abhixec(~abhinav@c-67-169-139-16.hsd1.ca.comcast.net) (Ping timeout: 268 seconds)
2023-01-02 22:10:48 +0100defjam(~defjam@90.201.240.60)
2023-01-02 22:16:04 +0100defjam(~defjam@90.201.240.60) (Ping timeout: 268 seconds)
2023-01-02 22:37:18 +0100gknux(~gknux@user/galaxy-knuckles/x-3015990) (Quit: ....and i am outta here....)
2023-01-02 22:38:17 +0100gknux(~gknux@user/galaxy-knuckles/x-3015990)
2023-01-02 22:45:44 +0100defjam(~defjam@90.201.240.60)
2023-01-02 22:50:39 +0100defjam(~defjam@90.201.240.60) (Ping timeout: 260 seconds)
2023-01-02 23:19:46 +0100defjam(~defjam@90.201.240.60)
2023-01-02 23:25:08 +0100defjam(~defjam@90.201.240.60) (Ping timeout: 268 seconds)
2023-01-02 23:30:45 +0100thyriaen(~thyriaen@2a01:aea0:dd4:4bae:6245:cbff:fe9f:48b1) (Quit: Leaving)
2023-01-02 23:33:41 +0100defjam(~defjam@90.201.240.60)
2023-01-02 23:35:39 +0100defjam(~defjam@90.201.240.60) (Client Quit)