2021/04/08

2021-04-08 00:08:40 +0200materiyolo(~materiyol@112.204.174.249)
2021-04-08 00:27:59 +0200seschwar(~seschwar@unaffiliated/seschwar) (Quit: :wq)
2021-04-08 00:34:51 +0200joshproehl(~quassel@dtools-d10-tx-1.inf.daedalusdreams.com) (Quit: Disappearing act!)
2021-04-08 00:35:50 +0200joshproehl(~quassel@dtools-d10-tx-1.inf.daedalusdreams.com)
2021-04-08 00:37:29 +0200joshproehl(~quassel@dtools-d10-tx-1.inf.daedalusdreams.com) (Client Quit)
2021-04-08 00:37:43 +0200joshproehl(~quassel@dtools-d10-tx-1.inf.daedalusdreams.com)
2021-04-08 01:02:43 +0200notis(~notis@213.16.157.14.dsl.dyn.forthnet.gr) (Ping timeout: 248 seconds)
2021-04-08 01:04:57 +0200kelnoky(~shao@ip1f128ba7.dynamic.kabel-deutschland.de) (Quit: WeeChat 3.1)
2021-04-08 01:24:31 +0200thc202(~thc202@unaffiliated/thc202) (Ping timeout: 245 seconds)
2021-04-08 01:27:22 +0200davemq(~davemq@99-179-0-50.lightspeed.austtx.sbcglobal.net) (Read error: Connection reset by peer)
2021-04-08 01:29:18 +0200davemq(~davemq@99-179-0-50.lightspeed.austtx.sbcglobal.net)
2021-04-08 01:29:44 +0200mc47(~yecinem@196.179.171.111) (Remote host closed the connection)
2021-04-08 01:30:22 +0200remo(~remo@wheelly-shelter.volia.net) (Remote host closed the connection)
2021-04-08 01:32:56 +0200dxld(~dxld@80-109-136-248.cable.dynamic.surfer.at) (Read error: Connection reset by peer)
2021-04-08 01:34:33 +0200dxld(~dxld@rush.pub.dxld.at)
2021-04-08 01:42:22 +0200materiyolo(~materiyol@112.204.174.249) (Quit: WeeChat 3.0.1)
2021-04-08 02:03:41 +0200s00pcan(~chris@107.181.165.217) (Read error: Connection reset by peer)
2021-04-08 02:05:43 +0200s00pcan(~chris@075-133-056-178.res.spectrum.com)
2021-04-08 04:48:04 +0200xaltsc_(~xaltsc@unaffiliated/xaltsc)
2021-04-08 04:51:26 +0200theDon(~td@muedsl-82-207-238-149.citykom.de) (Ping timeout: 240 seconds)
2021-04-08 04:53:38 +0200theDon(~td@muedsl-82-207-238-224.citykom.de)
2021-04-08 05:34:11 +0200s00pcan(~chris@075-133-056-178.res.spectrum.com) (Ping timeout: 248 seconds)
2021-04-08 05:35:55 +0200s00pcan(~chris@107.181.165.217)
2021-04-08 05:56:11 +0200evanjs(~evanjs@075-129-098-007.res.spectrum.com) (Ping timeout: 240 seconds)
2021-04-08 05:57:38 +0200evanjs(~evanjs@075-129-098-007.res.spectrum.com)
2021-04-08 05:59:11 +0200s00pcan(~chris@107.181.165.217) (Ping timeout: 240 seconds)
2021-04-08 06:01:06 +0200s00pcan(~chris@075-133-056-178.res.spectrum.com)
2021-04-08 07:18:58 +0200davemq(~davemq@99-179-0-50.lightspeed.austtx.sbcglobal.net) (Read error: Connection reset by peer)
2021-04-08 07:19:18 +0200davemq(~davemq@99-179-0-50.lightspeed.austtx.sbcglobal.net)
2021-04-08 07:47:43 +0200palo1(~weechat@c-base/crew/palo)
2021-04-08 07:50:41 +0200palo(~weechat@c-base/crew/palo) (Ping timeout: 240 seconds)
2021-04-08 07:50:42 +0200palo1palo
2021-04-08 07:51:11 +0200 <Solid> mc47[m]: would you care to expand on the "hakyll is discouraging for anyone to contribute"?
2021-04-08 07:55:21 +0200growpotkin(~growpotki@130-45-30-154.dyn.grandenetworks.net) (Quit: ZNC 1.8.2 - https://znc.in)
2021-04-08 07:58:36 +0200cfricke(~cfricke@unaffiliated/cfricke)
2021-04-08 08:03:34 +0200 <Solid> Liskni_si: sorry about #505 >.> I would force push the fix but I think a little too much time has passed
2021-04-08 08:33:24 +0200idhugo(~idhugo@87-49-147-45-mobile.dk.customer.tdc.net)
2021-04-08 08:35:13 +0200ml|(~ml|@unaffiliated/ml/x-3958674) (Ping timeout: 265 seconds)
2021-04-08 08:48:38 +0200ml|(~ml|@unaffiliated/ml/x-3958674)
2021-04-08 08:56:38 +0200s00pcan(~chris@075-133-056-178.res.spectrum.com) (Ping timeout: 240 seconds)
2021-04-08 08:56:57 +0200materiyolo(~materiyol@112.204.174.249)
2021-04-08 08:58:14 +0200ml|(~ml|@unaffiliated/ml/x-3958674) (Ping timeout: 268 seconds)
2021-04-08 08:58:46 +0200s00pcan(~chris@107.181.165.217)
2021-04-08 09:00:23 +0200idhugo_(~idhugo@80-62-116-143-mobile.dk.customer.tdc.net)
2021-04-08 09:02:41 +0200idhugo(~idhugo@87-49-147-45-mobile.dk.customer.tdc.net) (Ping timeout: 240 seconds)
2021-04-08 09:07:58 +0200srk(~sorki@unaffiliated/srk)
2021-04-08 09:11:25 +0200ml|(~ml|@unaffiliated/ml/x-3958674)
2021-04-08 09:13:00 +0200 <mc47[m]> Solid it's too big for what it does, and it's really hard to justify it
2021-04-08 09:13:56 +0200 <mc47[m]> Basically the hakyll file will be only rarely tweaked, and people would edit the actual pages
2021-04-08 09:14:57 +0200 <mc47[m]> Requiring them to build the whole thing just to be able to preview the changes is not justified, especially when there are smaller tools that do the same thing
2021-04-08 09:15:26 +0200 <mc47[m]> And that are pretty small and self-contained
2021-04-08 09:16:20 +0200 <Solid> oooh I thought you meant the project itself was discouraging contributions
2021-04-08 09:18:46 +0200ml|(~ml|@unaffiliated/ml/x-3958674) (Ping timeout: 260 seconds)
2021-04-08 09:18:48 +0200 <mc47[m]> Oh I can see the confusion, I updated the comments
2021-04-08 09:19:31 +0200idhugo_(~idhugo@80-62-116-143-mobile.dk.customer.tdc.net) (Ping timeout: 260 seconds)
2021-04-08 09:19:37 +0200 <mc47[m]> It's really a bummer, hakyll is quite clever in what it does and nice to use
2021-04-08 09:20:04 +0200idhugo(~idhugo@87-49-147-45-mobile.dk.customer.tdc.net)
2021-04-08 09:20:17 +0200 <Solid> :(
2021-04-08 09:22:06 +0200 <mc47[m]> I'm still gonna use it for my personal website probably, since I'll build everything on my own machine so it only takes a few seconds
2021-04-08 09:23:24 +0200idhugo_(~idhugo@80-62-116-143-mobile.dk.customer.tdc.net)
2021-04-08 09:23:44 +0200 <mc47[m]> Well, that seems to be a problem with Haskell... I remember I wanted to play with Haskell IDE Engine, but if you compile the thing from source, you'd need to recompile it for every ghc version of any project you want to try it on
2021-04-08 09:24:53 +0200 <mc47[m]> And it takes... a while. The first time I did it, the build failed after around 40 minutes, because my 8 GB of ram weren't enough
2021-04-08 09:25:24 +0200 <Solid> I just use my system's ghc everywhere
2021-04-08 09:25:28 +0200 <Solid> so I just build everything once
2021-04-08 09:25:46 +0200idhugo(~idhugo@87-49-147-45-mobile.dk.customer.tdc.net) (Ping timeout: 240 seconds)
2021-04-08 09:27:42 +0200 <mc47[m]> Is stack smart enough so when I put the same resolver, it only builds things once?
2021-04-08 09:29:02 +0200 <Solid> yes
2021-04-08 09:30:13 +0200 <mc47[m]> That's cool
2021-04-08 09:32:26 +0200ml|(~ml|@unaffiliated/ml/x-3958674)
2021-04-08 09:38:03 +0200ml|(~ml|@unaffiliated/ml/x-3958674) (Ping timeout: 265 seconds)
2021-04-08 09:47:55 +0200idhugo__(~idhugo@130.225.16.16)
2021-04-08 09:50:11 +0200idhugo_(~idhugo@80-62-116-143-mobile.dk.customer.tdc.net) (Ping timeout: 248 seconds)
2021-04-08 09:51:33 +0200ml|(~ml|@unaffiliated/ml/x-3958674)
2021-04-08 09:55:15 +0200materiyolo(~materiyol@112.204.174.249) (Quit: WeeChat 3.0.1)
2021-04-08 09:56:41 +0200ml|(~ml|@unaffiliated/ml/x-3958674) (Ping timeout: 240 seconds)
2021-04-08 10:10:47 +0200ml|(~ml|@unaffiliated/ml/x-3958674)
2021-04-08 10:17:02 +0200ml|(~ml|@unaffiliated/ml/x-3958674) (Ping timeout: 246 seconds)
2021-04-08 10:17:24 +0200 <Liskni_si> I wish Stack was also "smart enough" to support using precompiled binaries somehow
2021-04-08 10:18:10 +0200 <Liskni_si> what's the point of everyone rebuilding all the LTS packages from source, possibly again and again every week?
2021-04-08 10:21:24 +0200 <Solid> you mean of the whole executable?
2021-04-08 10:21:48 +0200 <Liskni_si> No, the deps.
2021-04-08 10:22:44 +0200 <Solid> like stack pulls their own precompiled binaries from stackage instead of pulling the sources?
2021-04-08 10:22:47 +0200 <Liskni_si> I just want to do "apt install libghc-pandoc-dev-lts-16" and never have to rebuild it every again.
2021-04-08 10:22:58 +0200 <Solid> ah I see
2021-04-08 10:24:07 +0200 <Liskni_si> I can do "apt install libghc-pandoc-dev" now, but then I'm limited to whatever version the debian maintainers happen to have packaged, and I can't use cabal/stack to build the rest
2021-04-08 10:24:37 +0200 <Liskni_si> I wish there was an apt repo with (meta)packages of multiple LTS versions, and for stack/cabal or whatever tool to support building on top of that
2021-04-08 10:25:32 +0200 <Liskni_si> shouldn't be all that hard to do the apt repo part actually, I'm a bit surprised it hasn't been done yet
2021-04-08 10:25:51 +0200 <Liskni_si> maybe I should propose that on the haskell discourse or something
2021-04-08 10:27:04 +0200 <Solid> oh that reminds me to set up proper mail integration for that discourse
2021-04-08 10:30:47 +0200ml|(~ml|@unaffiliated/ml/x-3958674)
2021-04-08 10:34:28 +0200thc202(~thc202@unaffiliated/thc202)
2021-04-08 10:35:43 +0200ml|(~ml|@unaffiliated/ml/x-3958674) (Ping timeout: 260 seconds)
2021-04-08 10:48:43 +0200ml|(~ml|@unaffiliated/ml/x-3958674)
2021-04-08 10:49:17 +0200Buliarous(~gypsydang@unaffiliated/buliarous) (Read error: Connection reset by peer)
2021-04-08 10:53:11 +0200ml|(~ml|@unaffiliated/ml/x-3958674) (Ping timeout: 240 seconds)
2021-04-08 11:06:18 +0200ml|(~ml|@unaffiliated/ml/x-3958674)
2021-04-08 11:11:11 +0200ml|(~ml|@unaffiliated/ml/x-3958674) (Ping timeout: 240 seconds)
2021-04-08 11:11:55 +0200 <Solid> Is there a module to pretty-print keymasks and -codes?
2021-04-08 11:13:18 +0200 <Solid> Like a pseudo-inverse to EZConfig: `ppKey :: (KeyMask, Keycode) -> String`, `ppKey (0, 97) == "a"` or something
2021-04-08 11:22:51 +0200ericsagn1(~ericsagne@2405:6580:0:5100:d2e3:b034:3303:1a96) (Ping timeout: 260 seconds)
2021-04-08 11:24:26 +0200ml|(~ml|@unaffiliated/ml/x-3958674)
2021-04-08 11:24:56 +0200Buliarous(~gypsydang@unaffiliated/buliarous)
2021-04-08 11:29:55 +0200ml|(~ml|@unaffiliated/ml/x-3958674) (Ping timeout: 248 seconds)
2021-04-08 11:34:40 +0200MrElendigevilop
2021-04-08 11:35:08 +0200ericsagn1(~ericsagne@2405:6580:0:5100:7cd7:690c:dd62:864c)
2021-04-08 11:40:04 +0200idhugo__(~idhugo@130.225.16.16) (Read error: Connection reset by peer)
2021-04-08 11:41:25 +0200idhugo__(~idhugo@80-62-116-143-mobile.dk.customer.tdc.net)
2021-04-08 11:43:42 +0200ml|(~ml|@unaffiliated/ml/x-3958674)
2021-04-08 11:48:41 +0200ml|(~ml|@unaffiliated/ml/x-3958674) (Ping timeout: 240 seconds)
2021-04-08 12:02:48 +0200ml|(~ml|@unaffiliated/ml/x-3958674)
2021-04-08 12:04:13 +0200dariof4(~dario@217.171.66.53)
2021-04-08 12:09:41 +0200ml|(~ml|@unaffiliated/ml/x-3958674) (Ping timeout: 240 seconds)
2021-04-08 12:18:01 +0200materiyolo(~materiyol@112.204.174.249)
2021-04-08 12:23:40 +0200ml|(~ml|@unaffiliated/ml/x-3958674)
2021-04-08 12:26:04 +0200cyr4x3(~cyr4x3@139.47.125.51)
2021-04-08 12:27:58 +0200ml|(~ml|@unaffiliated/ml/x-3958674) (Ping timeout: 240 seconds)
2021-04-08 12:32:14 +0200 <psibi[m]> pandoc seems to be shipping binaries, probably that can be used: https://github.com/jgm/pandoc/releases/tag/2.13 (Sorry if that was already discussed!)
2021-04-08 12:33:08 +0200cyr4x3(~cyr4x3@139.47.125.51) (Quit: WeeChat 1.6)
2021-04-08 12:34:37 +0200 <psibi[m]> I guess if it's for compiling hakyll, there is no easy way. My personal website is built via hakyll and I really want to move away from it because of the huge compile time.
2021-04-08 12:35:28 +0200xaltsc_(~xaltsc@unaffiliated/xaltsc) (Quit: WeeChat 3.1)
2021-04-08 12:37:32 +0200cyr4x3(~cyr4x3@139.47.125.51)
2021-04-08 12:41:16 +0200ml|(~ml|@unaffiliated/ml/x-3958674)
2021-04-08 12:43:07 +0200cyr4x3(~cyr4x3@139.47.125.51) (Quit: WeeChat 1.6)
2021-04-08 12:43:24 +0200cyr4x3(~cyr4x3@139.47.125.51)
2021-04-08 12:43:42 +0200cyr4x3(~cyr4x3@139.47.125.51) (Client Quit)
2021-04-08 12:44:18 +0200cyr4x3(~cyr4x3@139.47.125.51)
2021-04-08 12:44:18 +0200cyr4x3(~cyr4x3@139.47.125.51) (Client Quit)
2021-04-08 12:46:36 +0200ml|(~ml|@unaffiliated/ml/x-3958674) (Ping timeout: 260 seconds)
2021-04-08 12:46:43 +0200cyr4x3(~cyr4x3@139.47.125.51)
2021-04-08 12:50:29 +0200 <Liskni_si> psibi[m]: pandoc's binaries don't help us, hakyll compiles against pandoc as a library
2021-04-08 12:50:36 +0200 <Liskni_si> (just as GenerateManpage does/did)
2021-04-08 12:51:57 +0200 <psibi[m]> Ah, right. That's unfortunate.
2021-04-08 12:52:33 +0200 <Liskni_si> (dependencies are huge pain in the ass in most language ecosystems, but in Haskell they happen to be even worse than in most other)
2021-04-08 12:53:12 +0200cyr4x3(~cyr4x3@139.47.125.51) (Quit: WeeChat 1.6)
2021-04-08 12:54:20 +0200 <Liskni_si> which reminds me that these discussions probably make it easier for me to decide that I want genmanpage variant A :-)
2021-04-08 12:55:46 +0200 <Liskni_si> I was a bit torn before, as peti's arguments made sense and both variants' implementations were ugly in one way or another, but this half an hour of compiling issue is just fucked up (and yeah, I feel like it might drive me off Haskell sooner or later)
2021-04-08 12:58:02 +0200 <Liskni_si> oh and xscreensaver 6.0 was released, and it should no longer be crashable by faulty keyboards, so Solid can continue recommending it in the tutorial and geekosaur can restore his faith in jwz :-)
2021-04-08 12:59:15 +0200 <Solid> \o/
2021-04-08 12:59:40 +0200ml|(~ml|@unaffiliated/ml/x-3958674)
2021-04-08 12:59:48 +0200CosmosAtlas(~CosmosAtl@180.110.107.139)
2021-04-08 12:59:53 +0200 <Solid> > (and yeah, I feel like it might drive me off Haskell sooner or later)
2021-04-08 12:59:54 +0200 <Solid> D:
2021-04-08 12:59:54 +0200 <lambdabot> error: Variable not in scope: yeah :: t9 Boolerror:
2021-04-08 12:59:54 +0200 <lambdabot> Data constructor not in scope:
2021-04-08 12:59:55 +0200 <lambdabot> I :: t0
2021-04-08 13:00:01 +0200 <Solid> lol
2021-04-08 13:00:07 +0200 <Solid> I'm sorry lambdabot
2021-04-08 13:01:10 +0200 <Liskni_si> maybe it's not really "drive away from Haskell" but rather "shift weights in the decision process whether use of Haskell is a good trade-off"
2021-04-08 13:02:42 +0200 <Liskni_si> I woke up today with an irresistible urge to rewrite some of my little web hacks (rss generators and some api translators) from Haskell to Python because I can no longer be bothered to fight the build system
2021-04-08 13:03:16 +0200 <Liskni_si> I needed a short break from xmonad anyway :-)
2021-04-08 13:04:11 +0200 <CosmosAtlas> I might miss a bit of the earlier discussion. But how did you setup your Haskell environment?
2021-04-08 13:04:53 +0200 <CosmosAtlas> I once had many problems with that too. Then I switched to the "suggested" way of setting up Haskell/Stack/Cabal such without using system package manager. Never had a problem since.
2021-04-08 13:05:24 +0200 <Liskni_si> CosmosAtlas: the missing discussion is logged here: https://ircbrowse.tomsmeding.com/browse/xmonad
2021-04-08 13:05:32 +0200 <CosmosAtlas> IIRC, the huge big problem at that time (a few years ago) was everything either changed from dynamically linked to statically linked (or the other way around) on ArchLinux
2021-04-08 13:05:52 +0200 <Solid> well, haskell to python surely is a switch of paradigms =)
2021-04-08 13:06:08 +0200ml|(~ml|@unaffiliated/ml/x-3958674) (Ping timeout: 268 seconds)
2021-04-08 13:06:14 +0200 <Liskni_si> CosmosAtlas: tldr is that we were talking about using hakyll for the website which meant that rebuilding the website in github actions takes almost an hour
2021-04-08 13:06:34 +0200 <Liskni_si> compared to jekyll which is integrated in github pages and rebuilds the site in seconds
2021-04-08 13:07:06 +0200 <CosmosAtlas> Ahh. I guess my points are irrelevant then. Thanks for the tip.
2021-04-08 13:07:17 +0200 <Liskni_si> but yeah, the static/dynamic is a factor in my decision: I recently configured stack to build dynamically linked stuff, but this means that I can no longer scp binaries to my server and run them there
2021-04-08 13:07:59 +0200 <Liskni_si> and with just 2G RAM on it, GHC takes _ages_ there
2021-04-08 13:08:14 +0200 <Liskni_si> sure, I can tell stack to build a static binary
2021-04-08 13:08:26 +0200 <Solid> but it's a server so build times don't matter :>
2021-04-08 13:08:56 +0200 <Liskni_si> but for a toy project that is either 100 lines of Haskell or 100 lines of Python or 100 lines of something, it's just madness to waste all this time fighting the build system instead of just having "fun" coding
2021-04-08 13:09:22 +0200 <Liskni_si> Solid: it's not just time, it also purges all caches and makes my imap server unbearably slow
2021-04-08 13:09:30 +0200 <Solid> ah I see
2021-04-08 13:10:01 +0200Solidcan't have fun with python :(
2021-04-08 13:11:18 +0200 <Liskni_si> yeah, I really miss the types and the instant feedback from ghcid
2021-04-08 13:11:41 +0200 <Liskni_si> but I'm so irritated by the build process… :-/
2021-04-08 13:12:12 +0200 <Liskni_si> anyway, I'll see in a couple years, when new libraries break my code and I'll need to maintain it somehow
2021-04-08 13:12:39 +0200 <Liskni_si> writing Python is acceptable, maintaining old Python is something I have yet to discover :-)
2021-04-08 13:13:35 +0200 <Liskni_si> with xmonad the tradeoff is still good I think, btw: there are few big deps and the types really do help as it's a large-ish codebase
2021-04-08 13:13:57 +0200 <Liskni_si> (I need to go now, lunch and life and stuff)
2021-04-08 13:15:53 +0200 <Solid> have fun with that :)
2021-04-08 13:16:23 +0200 <Solid> I dunno, I just can't really get over having no types with these kinds of languages
2021-04-08 13:16:35 +0200 <Solid> LISPs are kind of acceptable because they just so interactive
2021-04-08 13:16:47 +0200 <Solid> but even then it's all write-only code for me :/
2021-04-08 13:17:23 +0200idhugo_(~idhugo@87-49-147-45-mobile.dk.customer.tdc.net)
2021-04-08 13:17:44 +0200 <Solid> then again what I _really_ want to do is write mathematics that compiles and does useful things :>
2021-04-08 13:19:54 +0200idhugo__(~idhugo@80-62-116-143-mobile.dk.customer.tdc.net) (Ping timeout: 265 seconds)
2021-04-08 13:23:19 +0200CosmosAtlas(~CosmosAtl@180.110.107.139) (Quit: WeeChat 3.1)
2021-04-08 13:24:02 +0200palo(~weechat@c-base/crew/palo) (Ping timeout: 268 seconds)
2021-04-08 13:28:13 +0200_ashbreeze_(~mark@64.85.214.234.reverse.socket.net) (Remote host closed the connection)
2021-04-08 13:30:45 +0200_ashbreeze_(~mark@64.85.214.234.reverse.socket.net)
2021-04-08 13:36:52 +0200ml|(~ml|@unaffiliated/ml/x-3958674)
2021-04-08 13:41:47 +0200ml|(~ml|@unaffiliated/ml/x-3958674) (Ping timeout: 246 seconds)
2021-04-08 13:46:54 +0200 <Liskni_si> I just want "useful things" :-)
2021-04-08 13:54:58 +0200ml|(~ml|@unaffiliated/ml/x-3958674)
2021-04-08 14:00:30 +0200ml|(~ml|@unaffiliated/ml/x-3958674) (Ping timeout: 265 seconds)
2021-04-08 14:06:13 +0200palo(~weechat@c-base/crew/palo)
2021-04-08 14:10:08 +0200geekosaur(82650c7a@130.101.12.122)
2021-04-08 14:13:42 +0200ml|(~ml|@unaffiliated/ml/x-3958674)
2021-04-08 14:15:25 +0200drl(~l@2600:1700:8360:3870:e13a:8137:183c:5bc5) (Remote host closed the connection)
2021-04-08 15:06:01 +0200davemq(~davemq@99-179-0-50.lightspeed.austtx.sbcglobal.net) (Read error: Connection reset by peer)
2021-04-08 15:06:23 +0200davemq(~davemq@99-179-0-50.lightspeed.austtx.sbcglobal.net)
2021-04-08 15:18:25 +0200 <psibi[m]> Reg the "drive away from Haskell" part, I have moved away from xmobar... I have been using my own personal fork of cnx (with a number of xmobar features that I use re-implemented)
2021-04-08 15:19:06 +0200 <psibi[m]> The good things is my cpu consumption time for the status bar has reduced.
2021-04-08 15:19:15 +0200 <psibi[m]> It used to be 4 hours before.
2021-04-08 15:19:39 +0200 <psibi[m]> Now it's like 10 seconds. (for a day's usage). Although, it's kind of unfair comparing cnx and xmobar!
2021-04-08 15:41:58 +0200growpotkin(~growpotki@130-45-30-154.dyn.grandenetworks.net)
2021-04-08 15:42:02 +0200geekosaur(82650c7a@130.101.12.122) (Ping timeout: 240 seconds)
2021-04-08 16:10:46 +0200idhugo_(~idhugo@87-49-147-45-mobile.dk.customer.tdc.net) (Ping timeout: 260 seconds)
2021-04-08 16:20:07 +0200 <Solid> I don't think it's the fault of haskell that xmobar is so resource heavy
2021-04-08 16:20:32 +0200 <Solid> see xmonad, which should ostensibly do a lot more and yet consumes _much_ less memory
2021-04-08 16:32:51 +0200typetetris(uid275937@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-mjjfisuvtdksxyob)
2021-04-08 16:40:58 +0200incertia(~incertia@d4-50-26-103.nap.wideopenwest.com) (Ping timeout: 240 seconds)
2021-04-08 16:45:58 +0200incertia(~incertia@d4-50-26-103.nap.wideopenwest.com)
2021-04-08 16:52:35 +0200cfricke(~cfricke@unaffiliated/cfricke) (Quit: WeeChat 3.1)
2021-04-08 17:14:33 +0200 <Liskni_si> Well we don't really know what's the problem with xmobar. :-/
2021-04-08 17:16:31 +0200 <Liskni_si> But in my setup it's not bad enough (compared to the browser and other things), so I can't really justify spending any more time on it.
2021-04-08 17:29:29 +0200thoros(~thoros@194-166-47-167.hdsl.highway.telekom.at)
2021-04-08 17:29:43 +0200idhugo_(~idhugo@87-49-147-45-mobile.dk.customer.tdc.net)
2021-04-08 17:34:24 +0200 <Solid> yeah with an open browser this all becomes sort of meaningless
2021-04-08 17:34:36 +0200 <Solid> xmobar is just so hackable that it's worth it for me
2021-04-08 17:41:56 +0200 <psibi[m]> I think xmobar's event loop is where the inefficiency is (inspite of excellent work from Liskni on optimizing it). And I don't see an easy way to fix it. cnx kind of avoids it totally by using tokio which is highly optimized and we don't wake up there every 10 seconds or so. But yeah, I agree that xmobar is still quite good compared to various other things running in your browser.
2021-04-08 17:57:49 +0200geekosaur(82650c7a@130.101.12.122)
2021-04-08 17:59:31 +0200ericsagn1(~ericsagne@2405:6580:0:5100:7cd7:690c:dd62:864c) (Ping timeout: 250 seconds)
2021-04-08 17:59:37 +0200 <Liskni_si> Yeah that might be it. Running multiple threads and synchronizing between them is definitely wasteful if all you need is to show the clock and maybe refresh a few widgets that don't need any async work at all.
2021-04-08 18:11:31 +0200ericsagn1(~ericsagne@2405:6580:0:5100:ea09:d4ec:d157:6a0d)
2021-04-08 18:34:41 +0200davemq(~davemq@99-179-0-50.lightspeed.austtx.sbcglobal.net) (Read error: Connection reset by peer)
2021-04-08 18:35:03 +0200davemq(~davemq@99-179-0-50.lightspeed.austtx.sbcglobal.net)
2021-04-08 18:37:36 +0200thoros(~thoros@194-166-47-167.hdsl.highway.telekom.at) (Quit: WeeChat 3.0.1)
2021-04-08 18:38:09 +0200incertia(~incertia@d4-50-26-103.nap.wideopenwest.com) (Quit: ZNC 1.7.5 - https://znc.in)
2021-04-08 18:44:02 +0200incertia(~incertia@d4-50-26-103.nap.wideopenwest.com)
2021-04-08 19:01:24 +0200davemq(~davemq@99-179-0-50.lightspeed.austtx.sbcglobal.net) (Read error: Connection reset by peer)
2021-04-08 19:02:00 +0200davemq(~davemq@99-179-0-50.lightspeed.austtx.sbcglobal.net)
2021-04-08 19:11:26 +0200 <geekosaur> hm. has anyone tried git xmonad with the 9.2 rc yet?
2021-04-08 19:11:33 +0200 <geekosaur> or are we missing some deps
2021-04-08 19:24:58 +0200idhugo_(~idhugo@87-49-147-45-mobile.dk.customer.tdc.net) (Ping timeout: 240 seconds)
2021-04-08 19:26:11 +0200 <Liskni_si> X11-xft will almost definitely break as it has a rather strict base upper bound
2021-04-08 19:26:32 +0200s00pcan(~chris@107.181.165.217) (Ping timeout: 246 seconds)
2021-04-08 19:26:49 +0200 <Liskni_si> if you tell stack to ignore that bound, then it might work, maybe
2021-04-08 19:27:01 +0200 <Liskni_si> (not sure if cabal can ignore bounds)
2021-04-08 19:27:50 +0200 <geekosaur> it has --allow-newer, yes
2021-04-08 19:28:07 +0200 <geekosaur> and --allow-older
2021-04-08 19:28:30 +0200s00pcan(~chris@075-133-056-178.res.spectrum.com)
2021-04-08 19:28:54 +0200 <geekosaur> can even drop that in cabal.project to specify it for one component
2021-04-08 19:31:20 +0200materiyolo(~materiyol@112.204.174.249) (Quit: WeeChat 3.0.1)
2021-04-08 19:33:56 +0200notis(~notis@213.16.157.14.dsl.dyn.forthnet.gr)
2021-04-08 19:40:17 +0200incertia(~incertia@d4-50-26-103.nap.wideopenwest.com) (Ping timeout: 265 seconds)
2021-04-08 19:57:22 +0200geekosaur(82650c7a@130.101.12.122) (Ping timeout: 240 seconds)
2021-04-08 20:04:04 +0200seschwar(~seschwar@unaffiliated/seschwar)
2021-04-08 20:15:55 +0200geekosaur(82650c7a@130.101.12.122)
2021-04-08 20:19:48 +0200incertia(~incertia@d4-50-26-103.nap.wideopenwest.com)
2021-04-08 20:21:50 +0200mc47(~yecinem@196.179.186.155)
2021-04-08 20:22:07 +0200mc47(~yecinem@196.179.186.155) (Remote host closed the connection)
2021-04-08 20:22:31 +0200mc47(~yecinem@196.179.186.155)
2021-04-08 20:24:47 +0200davemq(~davemq@99-179-0-50.lightspeed.austtx.sbcglobal.net) (Read error: Connection reset by peer)
2021-04-08 20:25:04 +0200davemq(~davemq@99-179-0-50.lightspeed.austtx.sbcglobal.net)
2021-04-08 20:47:31 +0200notis(~notis@213.16.157.14.dsl.dyn.forthnet.gr) (Ping timeout: 260 seconds)
2021-04-08 21:11:29 +0200ericsagn1(~ericsagne@2405:6580:0:5100:ea09:d4ec:d157:6a0d) (Ping timeout: 250 seconds)
2021-04-08 21:21:47 +0200dariof4(~dario@217.171.66.53) (Ping timeout: 265 seconds)
2021-04-08 21:22:23 +0200dariof4(~dario@217.171.66.53)
2021-04-08 21:23:43 +0200ericsagn1(~ericsagne@2405:6580:0:5100:889c:8645:b190:195f)
2021-04-08 21:26:40 +0200notis(~notis@213.16.157.14.dsl.dyn.forthnet.gr)
2021-04-08 22:04:12 +0200mc47(~yecinem@196.179.186.155) (Remote host closed the connection)
2021-04-08 22:04:34 +0200mc47(~yecinem@196.179.186.155)
2021-04-08 22:10:59 +0200srk(~sorki@unaffiliated/srk) (Ping timeout: 248 seconds)
2021-04-08 22:23:47 +0200geekosaur(82650c7a@130.101.12.122) (Quit: Connection closed)
2021-04-08 22:41:54 +0200davemq(~davemq@99-179-0-50.lightspeed.austtx.sbcglobal.net) (Read error: Connection reset by peer)
2021-04-08 22:42:27 +0200davemq(~davemq@99-179-0-50.lightspeed.austtx.sbcglobal.net)
2021-04-08 22:44:58 +0200davemq(~davemq@99-179-0-50.lightspeed.austtx.sbcglobal.net) (Read error: Connection reset by peer)
2021-04-08 22:45:30 +0200davemq(~davemq@99-179-0-50.lightspeed.austtx.sbcglobal.net)
2021-04-08 22:46:20 +0200mc47(~yecinem@196.179.186.155) (Read error: Connection reset by peer)
2021-04-08 22:46:53 +0200mc47(~yecinem@196.179.186.155)
2021-04-08 22:57:39 +0200davemq(~davemq@99-179-0-50.lightspeed.austtx.sbcglobal.net) (Read error: Connection reset by peer)
2021-04-08 22:57:57 +0200davemq(~davemq@99-179-0-50.lightspeed.austtx.sbcglobal.net)
2021-04-08 22:58:41 +0200mc47(~yecinem@196.179.186.155) (Remote host closed the connection)
2021-04-08 22:58:50 +0200mc47(~yecinem@196.179.186.155)
2021-04-08 22:59:11 +0200mc47(~yecinem@196.179.186.155) (Client Quit)
2021-04-08 23:20:32 +0200Habib(~Habib@185.169.233.238)