| 2023-03-01 05:10:55 +0000 | Diablo-D3 | (foobar@exelion.net) (Ping timeout: 246 seconds) |
| 2023-03-01 05:17:34 +0000 | Diablo-D3 | (foobar@exelion.net) |
| 2023-03-01 05:27:24 +0000 | Diablo-D3 | (foobar@exelion.net) (Remote host closed the connection) |
| 2023-03-01 05:27:49 +0000 | Diablo-D3 | (foobar@exelion.net) |
| 2023-03-01 10:38:34 +0000 | b50d | (~b50d@62.96.54.30) |
| 2023-03-01 12:56:17 +0000 | Bayes | (~Bayes@user/bayes) (*.net *.split) |
| 2023-03-01 13:00:58 +0000 | Bayes | (~Bayes@user/bayes) |
| 2023-03-01 16:53:58 +0000 | b50d | (~b50d@62.96.54.30) (Remote host closed the connection) |
| 2023-03-01 17:02:40 +0000 | <piraty> | after i went full-nerd with keymaps on my new split, which i fried with ESD very recently, i now realize i need kmonad on traditional keyboards. |
| 2023-03-01 17:06:52 +0000 | utis | (~utis@s176125235117.blix.com) |
| 2023-03-01 17:08:36 +0000 | <utis> | is it possible to do something when a given set (or number) of keys are down simultaneously, having been pressed in any order? |
| 2023-03-01 17:48:34 +0000 | <piraty> | technically: if the keycodes were not sent yet, sure. i don't know if kmonad can though |
| 2023-03-01 17:48:46 +0000 | <piraty> | what is your use-case– |
| 2023-03-01 18:38:35 +0000 | <utis> | cat lock |
| 2023-03-01 18:42:12 +0000 | <utis> | it's asking a bit much i suppose |
| 2023-03-01 20:05:15 +0000 | utis | (~utis@s176125235117.blix.com) (Ping timeout: 268 seconds) |