2021/07/23

2021-07-23 04:01:40 +0200 <contrapunctus> `((.) ($ f) (flip ($)))` funny dialect of Lisp you've got there 😏️
2021-07-23 08:01:11 +0200 <Solid> contrapunctus: it may be less obscurely written as ($ f) . (&)
2021-07-23 08:01:20 +0200 <Solid> then you can also kind of see what's going on
2021-07-23 08:01:59 +0200 <Solid> Tisoxin: it depends on how "completely" you want to understand the abstraction
2021-07-23 08:02:29 +0200 <Solid> I think you can fully understand Applicative in a Haskell context without knowing that it's a (lax) monoidal functor
2021-07-23 08:50:50 +0200 <Tisoxin> i think that as well
2021-07-23 08:55:07 +0200 <Tisoxin> https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/YkStSMnbC3/
2021-07-23 08:56:19 +0200 <Tisoxin> ↑ I think this excerpt from the typeclassopedia explains what I mean
2021-07-23 08:58:11 +0200 <Tisoxin> (Probably my opinion got heavily influenced by it)
2021-07-23 11:50:18 +0200 <Solid> ah I see
2021-07-23 11:50:40 +0200 <Solid> I think this makes it sound a little more mysterious than it is
2021-07-23 11:51:10 +0200 <Solid> it's not too hard to see that in order to chain effects, you need to be able to lift things in the first place
2021-07-23 11:51:25 +0200 <Solid> and that for directed chaining you need... to be able to chain at all
2021-07-23 23:15:22 +0200ircbrowse_tom(~ircbrowse@static.162.49.55.162.clients.your-server.de) (ZNC 1.7.5+deb4 - https://znc.in)
2021-07-23 23:15:36 +0200ircbrowse_tom_(~ircbrowse@2a01:4f8:1c1c:9319::1)
2021-07-23 23:15:42 +0200Server+nt