Newest at the top
| 2024-09-29 23:35:57 +0200 | <andrewboltachev> | the [*] type)? |
| 2024-09-29 23:35:57 +0200 | <andrewboltachev> | Hello! CT question: category Set is known to have objects as sets, and arrows as functions between them. Here this diargam: https://main.andrewboltachev.site/toolbox/logicore1/6ac02cce-49ba-47c2-acef-b592e53d2fa1/7/ displays simple algebraic type, similar to (Int, [String]). Is it possible to have a category where Objects are things like (_, _), [_], Int, String, and arrows -- connections between them like fst, snd, * (the argument for |
| 2024-09-29 23:35:09 +0200 | misterfish | (~misterfis@87.215.131.102) misterfish |
| 2024-09-29 23:35:00 +0200 | <dolio> | The docs for `optimization:` also tell you this. |
| 2024-09-29 23:34:51 +0200 | <monochrom> | It is somewhere in the docs since the vast improvement some years ago. But not back in my days. |
| 2024-09-29 23:34:17 +0200 | <geekosaur> | https://github.com/geekosaur/xmonad.hs/blob/hilfy-2023/cabal.project.local |
| 2024-09-29 23:33:52 +0200 | <monochrom> | Then I went on to read source code to find out you can do https://www.vex.net/~trebla/haskell/cabal-cabal.xhtml#O2 |
| 2024-09-29 23:33:39 +0200 | <geekosaur> | cabal file no, cabal.project{,.local} yes |
| 2024-09-29 23:33:21 +0200 | <monochrom> | I used "cabal install -v" to discover it. :) |
| 2024-09-29 23:32:18 +0200 | <[exa]> | dolio: anyway thanks for confirming the -O, I looked at some docs and it didn't look very obvious there |
| 2024-09-29 23:31:33 +0200 | <[exa]> | "if you forget the 2 flags, stuff is gonna get veeeeeeeeeeery slow" |
| 2024-09-29 23:31:33 +0200 | merijn | (~merijn@204-220-045-062.dynamic.caiway.nl) merijn |
| 2024-09-29 23:30:59 +0200 | <[exa]> | hm maybe I should simply provide some kind of install copypaste that has the inlining -f's in it |
| 2024-09-29 23:30:36 +0200 | andrewboltachev | (~andrey@178.141.123.3) andrewboltachev |
| 2024-09-29 23:27:51 +0200 | juri_ | (~juri@implicitcad.org) juri_ |
| 2024-09-29 23:24:40 +0200 | peterbecich | (~Thunderbi@syn-047-229-123-186.res.spectrum.com) peterbecich |
| 2024-09-29 23:23:59 +0200 | <dolio> | And by "do that" I mean turn off those optimizations in that case. |
| 2024-09-29 23:23:37 +0200 | <dolio> | I don't recall if you can test for someone saying to optimize less, or if you'd have to use a flag for that, but maybe you should do that in case someone wants to build faster. |
| 2024-09-29 23:22:09 +0200 | <dolio> | Cabal does -O by default. |
| 2024-09-29 23:20:53 +0200 | merijn | (~merijn@204-220-045-062.dynamic.caiway.nl) (Ping timeout: 248 seconds) |
| 2024-09-29 23:20:47 +0200 | weary-traveler | (~user@user/user363627) user363627 |
| 2024-09-29 23:20:22 +0200 | <[exa]> | (in my case there's a few executables and stuff like -fexpose-unfoldings and -fspecialise-aggressively gives ~20x speedup for free) |
| 2024-09-29 23:17:50 +0200 | <[exa]> | is it a good practice to put optimization flags into a cabal file, or is there some mechanism that defaults stuff well from the environment? (also, does the default include -O or not?) |
| 2024-09-29 23:17:49 +0200 | raehik | (~raehik@rdng-25-b2-v4wan-169990-cust1344.vm39.cable.virginm.net) raehik |
| 2024-09-29 23:17:29 +0200 | aforemny | (~aforemny@i59F4C7BB.versanet.de) aforemny |
| 2024-09-29 23:15:46 +0200 | merijn | (~merijn@204-220-045-062.dynamic.caiway.nl) merijn |
| 2024-09-29 23:12:27 +0200 | weary-traveler | (~user@user/user363627) (Remote host closed the connection) |
| 2024-09-29 23:04:36 +0200 | merijn | (~merijn@204-220-045-062.dynamic.caiway.nl) (Ping timeout: 246 seconds) |
| 2024-09-29 23:04:11 +0200 | jinsun | (~jinsun@user/jinsun) (Client Quit) |
| 2024-09-29 23:04:03 +0200 | Guest2324 | (~jinsun@user/jinsun) () |
| 2024-09-29 23:03:57 +0200 | jinsun_ | jinsun |
| 2024-09-29 23:03:57 +0200 | jinsun | Guest2324 |
| 2024-09-29 23:03:57 +0200 | jinsun_ | (~jinsun@user/jinsun) jinsun |
| 2024-09-29 22:59:59 +0200 | merijn | (~merijn@204-220-045-062.dynamic.caiway.nl) merijn |
| 2024-09-29 22:58:56 +0200 | weary-traveler | (~user@user/user363627) user363627 |
| 2024-09-29 22:58:15 +0200 | <deepfire> | ok, I had to cave in and come up with a secret storage backend |
| 2024-09-29 22:49:14 +0200 | merijn | (~merijn@204-220-045-062.dynamic.caiway.nl) (Ping timeout: 260 seconds) |
| 2024-09-29 22:48:17 +0200 | Typedfern | (~Typedfern@2a02:9130:9c34:14e4:99e7:1e2d:3a90:e394) typedfern |
| 2024-09-29 22:47:06 +0200 | <geekosaur> | `dbus-launch nheko`? |
| 2024-09-29 22:46:16 +0200 | <deepfire> | "Nheko could not connect to the secure storage to save encryption secrets to. This can have multiple reasons. Check if your D-Bus service is running and you have configured a service like KWallet, Gnome Keyring, KeePassXC or the equivalent for your platform. If you are having trouble, feel free to open an issue here: https://github.com/Nheko-Reborn/nheko/issues" |
| 2024-09-29 22:45:49 +0200 | <geekosaur> | might require some part of the KDE services (kwalletd?) |
| 2024-09-29 22:45:35 +0200 | <geekosaur> | I have no idea, I've never seen that |
| 2024-09-29 22:45:24 +0200 | raehik | (~raehik@rdng-25-b2-v4wan-169990-cust1344.vm39.cable.virginm.net) (Ping timeout: 265 seconds) |
| 2024-09-29 22:45:06 +0200 | <deepfire> | geekosaur: is there a way to circumvent nheko's insistence on failing without it being able to access "secure storage"? |
| 2024-09-29 22:44:11 +0200 | merijn | (~merijn@204-220-045-062.dynamic.caiway.nl) merijn |
| 2024-09-29 22:41:26 +0200 | <haskellbridge> | <sm> but that's a quick PR away |
| 2024-09-29 22:41:06 +0200 | <haskellbridge> | <sm> hmm, not much about networking in there |
| 2024-09-29 22:36:47 +0200 | takuan | (~takuan@178-116-218-225.access.telenet.be) (Remote host closed the connection) |
| 2024-09-29 22:35:44 +0200 | Typedfern | (~Typedfern@2a02:9130:9c34:14e4:a221:40a0:af5b:f354) (Ping timeout: 265 seconds) |
| 2024-09-29 22:34:57 +0200 | <haskellbridge> | <sm> for the former, your building blocks are: https://chrisdone.github.io/hell/api |