2024/09/27

Newest at the top

2024-09-27 03:25:52 +0200merijn(~merijn@204-220-045-062.dynamic.caiway.nl) merijn
2024-09-27 03:24:38 +0200troojg(~troojg@user/troojg) troojg
2024-09-27 03:24:34 +0200ezzieyguywuf(~Unknown@user/ezzieyguywuf) ezzieyguywuf
2024-09-27 03:19:51 +0200ezzieyguywuf(~Unknown@user/ezzieyguywuf) (Quit: Lost terminal)
2024-09-27 03:19:17 +0200pavonia(~user@user/siracusa) siracusa
2024-09-27 03:18:53 +0200morb(~morb@pool-108-41-100-120.nycmny.fios.verizon.net) (Ping timeout: 255 seconds)
2024-09-27 03:15:17 +0200merijn(~merijn@204-220-045-062.dynamic.caiway.nl) (Ping timeout: 255 seconds)
2024-09-27 03:12:20 +0200identity(~identity@user/ZharMeny) (Quit: ERC 5.5.0.29.1 (IRC client for GNU Emacs 29.4))
2024-09-27 03:11:28 +0200 <dibblego> it should be init . tails
2024-09-27 03:10:31 +0200JuanDaugherty(~juan@user/JuanDaugherty) JuanDaugherty
2024-09-27 03:10:24 +0200morb(~morb@pool-108-41-100-120.nycmny.fios.verizon.net)
2024-09-27 03:10:05 +0200merijn(~merijn@204-220-045-062.dynamic.caiway.nl) merijn
2024-09-27 03:04:54 +0200weary-traveler(~user@user/user363627) (Ping timeout: 265 seconds)
2024-09-27 03:03:04 +0200Smiles(uid551636@id-551636.lymington.irccloud.com) (Quit: Connection closed for inactivity)
2024-09-27 03:00:41 +0200user363627(~user@user/user363627) user363627
2024-09-27 02:59:35 +0200merijn(~merijn@204-220-045-062.dynamic.caiway.nl) (Ping timeout: 265 seconds)
2024-09-27 02:55:06 +0200 <Inst> it's basically tails :: [a] -> [[a]]
2024-09-27 02:54:18 +0200merijn(~merijn@204-220-045-062.dynamic.caiway.nl) merijn
2024-09-27 02:54:05 +0200Misosabbe(~Misosabbe@2a00:801:4f3:fb9c:22d2:cc07:9cb3:2) (Quit: Client closed)
2024-09-27 02:53:04 +0200 <Inst> whoa, is it me or is the duplicate instance for NonEmpty pretty psychedelic?
2024-09-27 02:46:13 +0200morb(~morb@pool-108-41-100-120.nycmny.fios.verizon.net) (Ping timeout: 248 seconds)
2024-09-27 02:43:38 +0200merijn(~merijn@204-220-045-062.dynamic.caiway.nl) (Ping timeout: 265 seconds)
2024-09-27 02:40:15 +0200peterbecich(~Thunderbi@syn-047-229-123-186.res.spectrum.com) (Ping timeout: 265 seconds)
2024-09-27 02:39:45 +0200morb(~morb@pool-108-41-100-120.nycmny.fios.verizon.net)
2024-09-27 02:38:32 +0200merijn(~merijn@204-220-045-062.dynamic.caiway.nl) merijn
2024-09-27 02:36:41 +0200gdr3941(~user@172-3-47-206.lightspeed.nsvltn.sbcglobal.net) (Quit: Fading out...)
2024-09-27 02:36:34 +0200xff0x(~xff0x@2405:6580:b080:900:edb3:3e3f:7e00:b65b) (Ping timeout: 260 seconds)
2024-09-27 02:27:35 +0200merijn(~merijn@204-220-045-062.dynamic.caiway.nl) (Ping timeout: 255 seconds)
2024-09-27 02:23:51 +0200gdr3941(~user@172-3-47-206.lightspeed.nsvltn.sbcglobal.net) gdr3941
2024-09-27 02:22:45 +0200merijn(~merijn@204-220-045-062.dynamic.caiway.nl) merijn
2024-09-27 02:17:26 +0200peterbecich(~Thunderbi@syn-047-229-123-186.res.spectrum.com) peterbecich
2024-09-27 02:17:19 +0200 <Inst> although there's definitely cases where the scoping is what you want
2024-09-27 02:17:05 +0200 <Inst> also int-e, your way is better because it always executes on the top-level, whereas let / where with bang patterns only executes in the particular branch of the function
2024-09-27 02:15:23 +0200morb(~morb@pool-108-41-100-120.nycmny.fios.verizon.net) (Ping timeout: 245 seconds)
2024-09-27 02:14:39 +0200polyphem(~rod@p4fc2ccf6.dip0.t-ipconnect.de) polyphem
2024-09-27 02:12:30 +0200polyphem(~rod@p4fc2c857.dip0.t-ipconnect.de) (Ping timeout: 246 seconds)
2024-09-27 02:12:13 +0200merijn(~merijn@204-220-045-062.dynamic.caiway.nl) (Ping timeout: 265 seconds)
2024-09-27 02:11:51 +0200arahael(~arahael@user/arahael) arahael
2024-09-27 02:10:05 +0200morb(~morb@pool-108-41-100-120.nycmny.fios.verizon.net)
2024-09-27 02:08:50 +0200raehik(~raehik@rdng-25-b2-v4wan-169990-cust1344.vm39.cable.virginm.net) (Ping timeout: 265 seconds)
2024-09-27 02:06:58 +0200merijn(~merijn@204-220-045-062.dynamic.caiway.nl) merijn
2024-09-27 02:04:08 +0200Tuplanolla(~Tuplanoll@91-159-69-59.elisa-laajakaista.fi) (Quit: Leaving.)
2024-09-27 02:04:07 +0200 <geekosaur> case guards
2024-09-27 02:03:58 +0200 <geekosaur> oh, I thought you meant what int-e was talking about
2024-09-27 02:03:34 +0200 <lambdabot> Alternative f => Bool -> f ()
2024-09-27 02:03:34 +0200 <Inst> it's in a do block over list with guard forcing termination
2024-09-27 02:03:33 +0200 <geekosaur> :t guard
2024-09-27 02:03:19 +0200 <Inst> am i misusing guard?
2024-09-27 02:02:40 +0200geekosaurwonders if you really want `guard`
2024-09-27 02:00:49 +0200 <Inst> i was using !_ = assert (9 > length neighbors) () as the checkpoint